Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures

We analyze time series of Strombolian volcanic tremor, focusing our attention on the frequency band [0.1–0.5] Hz (very long period (VLP) tremor). Although this frequency band is largely affected by noise, we evidence two significant components by using Independent Component Analysis with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. De Lauro, S. De Martino, M. Falanga, M. Palo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2006-01-01
Series:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Online Access:http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/13/393/2006/npg-13-393-2006.pdf
id doaj-9b8bba5aed104d36ae8b1566483db0fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b8bba5aed104d36ae8b1566483db0fd2020-11-25T00:56:23ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79462006-01-01134393400Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structuresE. De LauroS. De MartinoS. De MartinoS. De MartinoM. FalangaM. FalangaM. FalangaM. PaloWe analyze time series of Strombolian volcanic tremor, focusing our attention on the frequency band [0.1–0.5] Hz (very long period (VLP) tremor). Although this frequency band is largely affected by noise, we evidence two significant components by using Independent Component Analysis with the frequencies, respectively, of ~0.2 and ~0.4 Hz. We show that these components display wavefield features similar to those of the high frequency Strombolian signals (>0.5 Hz). In fact, they are radially polarised and located within the crater area. This characterization is lost when an enhancement of energy appears. In this case, the presence of microseismic noise becomes relevant. Investigating the entire large data set available, we determine how microseismic noise influences the signals. We ascribe the microseismic noise source to Scirocco wind. Moreover, our analysis allows one to evidence that the Strombolian conduit vibrates like the asymmetric cavity associated with musical instruments generating self-sustained tones.http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/13/393/2006/npg-13-393-2006.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. De Lauro
S. De Martino
S. De Martino
S. De Martino
M. Falanga
M. Falanga
M. Falanga
M. Palo
spellingShingle E. De Lauro
S. De Martino
S. De Martino
S. De Martino
M. Falanga
M. Falanga
M. Falanga
M. Palo
Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
author_facet E. De Lauro
S. De Martino
S. De Martino
S. De Martino
M. Falanga
M. Falanga
M. Falanga
M. Palo
author_sort E. De Lauro
title Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
title_short Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
title_full Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
title_fullStr Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
title_full_unstemmed Statistical analysis of Stromboli VLP tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] Hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
title_sort statistical analysis of stromboli vlp tremor in the band [0.1–0.5] hz: some consequences for vibrating structures
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
issn 1023-5809
1607-7946
publishDate 2006-01-01
description We analyze time series of Strombolian volcanic tremor, focusing our attention on the frequency band [0.1–0.5] Hz (very long period (VLP) tremor). Although this frequency band is largely affected by noise, we evidence two significant components by using Independent Component Analysis with the frequencies, respectively, of ~0.2 and ~0.4 Hz. We show that these components display wavefield features similar to those of the high frequency Strombolian signals (>0.5 Hz). In fact, they are radially polarised and located within the crater area. This characterization is lost when an enhancement of energy appears. In this case, the presence of microseismic noise becomes relevant. Investigating the entire large data set available, we determine how microseismic noise influences the signals. We ascribe the microseismic noise source to Scirocco wind. Moreover, our analysis allows one to evidence that the Strombolian conduit vibrates like the asymmetric cavity associated with musical instruments generating self-sustained tones.
url http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/13/393/2006/npg-13-393-2006.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT edelauro statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT sdemartino statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT sdemartino statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT sdemartino statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT mfalanga statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT mfalanga statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT mfalanga statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
AT mpalo statisticalanalysisofstrombolivlptremorintheband01ndash05hzsomeconsequencesforvibratingstructures
_version_ 1725227555375546368