Agronomic and economic impacts of cover crops in Texas rolling plains cotton

• Main Authors: Paul B. DeLaune, P. Mubvumba, Y. Fan, S. Bevers
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
• Series: Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20027

Abstract Cover crops have been proposed as a resource that could enhance the effect of no‐till (NT) cropping systems. Crop yield limitations due to cover crops in the U.S. Great Plains are a concern to potential adopters. This research determined the impact of cover crops on crop yield and economic return compared with conventional practices in dryland systems of the Texas Rolling Plains. The study conducted at the Texas A&M AgriLife Chillicothe Research Station evaluated the following treatments: (a) conventional till (CT); (b) NT, and NT with the following cover crops; (c) Austrian winter pea (Pisum sativum L.); (d) hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.); (e) crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.); (f) winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.); and (g) a multi‐species mixture. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields, expenses, and returns were determined over a 4‐yr period (2013–2016). Cover crops increased total seed costs compared to CT and NT. Hairy vetch and the multi‐species mixture increased total expenses over CT and NT. However, no significant treatment effect was determined for crop yield or net return among treatments. A multi‐species mixture did not provide an agronomic or economic advantage compared to single species cover crop approaches. Under dryland conditions in the Texas Rolling Plains, these selected cover crops maintained cotton yields without negatively affecting net returns. Other ecosystem services should be considered prior to implementing cover crops in studied cropping systems. Site‐specific research is warranted in regions of the southern Great Plains where water may be more limited than the Texas Rolling Plains.