The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood

A substantial portion of the knowledge base of psychology is based on subjective reports with a risk of information bias. The objective of the present study was to elucidate one contextual source of variance and potential bias in subjective reports: the influence of affective state at the time of re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kine Askim, Stein Knardahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601083/full
id doaj-9bb0c26444e144128f721a07d79d9989
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bb0c26444e144128f721a07d79d99892021-02-18T05:46:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-02-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.601083601083The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of MoodKine AskimStein KnardahlA substantial portion of the knowledge base of psychology is based on subjective reports with a risk of information bias. The objective of the present study was to elucidate one contextual source of variance and potential bias in subjective reports: the influence of affective state at the time of responding to questionnaires. Employees (N = 67, abstaining from stimulants and activities that may influence emotional and physiological state) were subjected to mood-induction procedures in the laboratory. Neutral, positive, and negative moods were induced by combinations of pictures from the international affective picture set (IAPS) and music. The subjects responded to questions on visual analog scales (VAS) in order to optimize sensitivity and attenuate short-term memory effects. Most subjects exhibited significant affective-state inductions with no change in arousal. The analyses took affective response to the manipulation into account. Only four of 20 questions were somewhat influenced by induced affective state: job overload, social support from co-workers, satisfaction with getting to develop personally, and an item measuring agreeableness. In general, responding to questions of work that were phrased for valence was little or insignificantly influenced by induced affective state.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601083/fullsubjective reportsself-reportmethod biasaffective statemood inductionquestionnaires
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kine Askim
Stein Knardahl
spellingShingle Kine Askim
Stein Knardahl
The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood
Frontiers in Psychology
subjective reports
self-report
method bias
affective state
mood induction
questionnaires
author_facet Kine Askim
Stein Knardahl
author_sort Kine Askim
title The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood
title_short The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood
title_full The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood
title_fullStr The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Affective State on Subjective-Report Measurements: Evidence From Experimental Manipulations of Mood
title_sort influence of affective state on subjective-report measurements: evidence from experimental manipulations of mood
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-02-01
description A substantial portion of the knowledge base of psychology is based on subjective reports with a risk of information bias. The objective of the present study was to elucidate one contextual source of variance and potential bias in subjective reports: the influence of affective state at the time of responding to questionnaires. Employees (N = 67, abstaining from stimulants and activities that may influence emotional and physiological state) were subjected to mood-induction procedures in the laboratory. Neutral, positive, and negative moods were induced by combinations of pictures from the international affective picture set (IAPS) and music. The subjects responded to questions on visual analog scales (VAS) in order to optimize sensitivity and attenuate short-term memory effects. Most subjects exhibited significant affective-state inductions with no change in arousal. The analyses took affective response to the manipulation into account. Only four of 20 questions were somewhat influenced by induced affective state: job overload, social support from co-workers, satisfaction with getting to develop personally, and an item measuring agreeableness. In general, responding to questions of work that were phrased for valence was little or insignificantly influenced by induced affective state.
topic subjective reports
self-report
method bias
affective state
mood induction
questionnaires
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601083/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kineaskim theinfluenceofaffectivestateonsubjectivereportmeasurementsevidencefromexperimentalmanipulationsofmood
AT steinknardahl theinfluenceofaffectivestateonsubjectivereportmeasurementsevidencefromexperimentalmanipulationsofmood
AT kineaskim influenceofaffectivestateonsubjectivereportmeasurementsevidencefromexperimentalmanipulationsofmood
AT steinknardahl influenceofaffectivestateonsubjectivereportmeasurementsevidencefromexperimentalmanipulationsofmood
_version_ 1724263926579855360