A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration

Several biomaterials have recently been developed to address the challenge of osteochondral regeneration. Among these, chitosan holds promises both for cartilage and bone healing. The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the regeneration potential of a novel hybrid magnesium-doped hydroxyapatit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alice Roffi, Elizaveta Kon, Francesco Perdisa, Milena Fini, Alessandro Di Martino, Annapaola Parrilli, Francesca Salamanna, Monica Sandri, Maria Sartori, Simone Sprio, Anna Tampieri, Maurilio Marcacci, Giuseppe Filardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/9/2227
id doaj-9be17833e9854c8c9b4963e2675ad789
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9be17833e9854c8c9b4963e2675ad7892020-11-25T01:36:39ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1422-00672019-05-01209222710.3390/ijms20092227ijms20092227A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral RegenerationAlice Roffi0Elizaveta Kon1Francesco Perdisa2Milena Fini3Alessandro Di Martino4Annapaola Parrilli5Francesca Salamanna6Monica Sandri7Maria Sartori8Simone Sprio9Anna Tampieri10Maurilio Marcacci11Giuseppe Filardo12Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyKnee Joint Reconstruction Center—3rd Orthopedic Division, Humanitas Clinical Institute, 20089 Rozzano, ItalyHip and Knee Replacement Department, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyII Orthopedic and Traumatologic Clinic; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council (ISTEC-CNR), 48018 Faenza, ItalyLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalyInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council (ISTEC-CNR), 48018 Faenza, ItalyInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council (ISTEC-CNR), 48018 Faenza, ItalyKnee Joint Reconstruction Center—3rd Orthopedic Division, Humanitas Clinical Institute, 20089 Rozzano, ItalyApplied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS—Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, ItalySeveral biomaterials have recently been developed to address the challenge of osteochondral regeneration. Among these, chitosan holds promises both for cartilage and bone healing. The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the regeneration potential of a novel hybrid magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite (MgHA), collagen, chitosan-based scaffold, which was tested in a sheep model to ascertain its osteochondral regenerative potential, and in a rabbit model to further evaluate its ability to regenerate bone tissue. Macroscopic, microtomography, histology, histomorphometry, and immunohistochemical analysis were performed. In the sheep model, all analyses did not show significant differences compared to untreated defects (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), with no evidence of cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration. In the rabbit model, this bone scaffold provided less ability to enhance tissue healing compared with a commercial bone scaffold. Moreover, persistence of scaffold material and absence of integration with connective tissue around the scaffolds were observed. These results raised some concerns about the osteochondral use of this chitosan composite scaffold, especially for the bone layer. Further studies are needed to explore the best formulation of chitosan-reinforced composites for osteochondral treatment.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/9/2227chitosanosteochondralbonecartilagefailurescaffold
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alice Roffi
Elizaveta Kon
Francesco Perdisa
Milena Fini
Alessandro Di Martino
Annapaola Parrilli
Francesca Salamanna
Monica Sandri
Maria Sartori
Simone Sprio
Anna Tampieri
Maurilio Marcacci
Giuseppe Filardo
spellingShingle Alice Roffi
Elizaveta Kon
Francesco Perdisa
Milena Fini
Alessandro Di Martino
Annapaola Parrilli
Francesca Salamanna
Monica Sandri
Maria Sartori
Simone Sprio
Anna Tampieri
Maurilio Marcacci
Giuseppe Filardo
A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
chitosan
osteochondral
bone
cartilage
failure
scaffold
author_facet Alice Roffi
Elizaveta Kon
Francesco Perdisa
Milena Fini
Alessandro Di Martino
Annapaola Parrilli
Francesca Salamanna
Monica Sandri
Maria Sartori
Simone Sprio
Anna Tampieri
Maurilio Marcacci
Giuseppe Filardo
author_sort Alice Roffi
title A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration
title_short A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration
title_full A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration
title_fullStr A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed A Composite Chitosan-Reinforced Scaffold Fails to Provide Osteochondral Regeneration
title_sort composite chitosan-reinforced scaffold fails to provide osteochondral regeneration
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
issn 1422-0067
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Several biomaterials have recently been developed to address the challenge of osteochondral regeneration. Among these, chitosan holds promises both for cartilage and bone healing. The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the regeneration potential of a novel hybrid magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite (MgHA), collagen, chitosan-based scaffold, which was tested in a sheep model to ascertain its osteochondral regenerative potential, and in a rabbit model to further evaluate its ability to regenerate bone tissue. Macroscopic, microtomography, histology, histomorphometry, and immunohistochemical analysis were performed. In the sheep model, all analyses did not show significant differences compared to untreated defects (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), with no evidence of cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration. In the rabbit model, this bone scaffold provided less ability to enhance tissue healing compared with a commercial bone scaffold. Moreover, persistence of scaffold material and absence of integration with connective tissue around the scaffolds were observed. These results raised some concerns about the osteochondral use of this chitosan composite scaffold, especially for the bone layer. Further studies are needed to explore the best formulation of chitosan-reinforced composites for osteochondral treatment.
topic chitosan
osteochondral
bone
cartilage
failure
scaffold
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/9/2227
work_keys_str_mv AT aliceroffi acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT elizavetakon acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT francescoperdisa acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT milenafini acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT alessandrodimartino acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT annapaolaparrilli acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT francescasalamanna acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT monicasandri acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT mariasartori acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT simonesprio acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT annatampieri acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT mauriliomarcacci acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT giuseppefilardo acompositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT aliceroffi compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT elizavetakon compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT francescoperdisa compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT milenafini compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT alessandrodimartino compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT annapaolaparrilli compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT francescasalamanna compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT monicasandri compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT mariasartori compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT simonesprio compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT annatampieri compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT mauriliomarcacci compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
AT giuseppefilardo compositechitosanreinforcedscaffoldfailstoprovideosteochondralregeneration
_version_ 1725061706534617088