WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI

Analysis of the current literature showed that in publications, in our opinion, there is no master: a scientific analysis of the reasons behind the decline in the quality of knowledge of the doctor, as well as the scientific basis of modern pedagogical technologies introduced in the process of train...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. F. Tetenev, T. N. Bodrova, A. I. Karzilov, K. F. Tetenev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Siberian State Medical University (Tomsk) 2014-10-01
Series:Bûlleten' Sibirskoj Mediciny
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bulletin.tomsk.ru/jour/article/view/237
id doaj-9bf4f61071c84fd3a5741bcbe9f08277
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9bf4f61071c84fd3a5741bcbe9f082772021-07-29T08:38:00ZengSiberian State Medical University (Tomsk)Bûlleten' Sibirskoj Mediciny1682-03631819-36842014-10-0113517918310.20538/1682-0363-2014-5-179-183235WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICIF. F. Tetenev0T. N. Bodrova1A. I. Karzilov2K. F. Tetenev3Siberian State Medical University, TomskSiberian State Medical University, TomskSiberian State Medical University, TomskSiberian State Medical University, TomskAnalysis of the current literature showed that in publications, in our opinion, there is no master: a scientific analysis of the reasons behind the decline in the quality of knowledge of the doctor, as well as the scientific basis of modern pedagogical technologies introduced in the process of training future doctors to address this problem. Objective and subjective factors are having a negative effect on the quality of the doctor's knowledge. The generally accepted methods of assessing the quality of knowledge – testing and rating system – have their limitations. Testing reflects the level of knowledge about the thinking style of the originator of test tasks. Ranking system for assessing knowledge increasingly characterized by diligence in studying medicine. It is proposed to upgrade the quality of medical knowledge in the teaching of the theory of integration of diagnostics. Amount of knowledge to evaluate the content of educational narrative history of the disease. The quality of the knowledge to assess the content of professional clinical picture comment in the history of the disease.https://bulletin.tomsk.ru/jour/article/view/237the theory of diagnosisquantitative assessment of knowledgequalitative assessment of knowledgethe clinical thinkingthe doctor's knowledgethe doctor's thinking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. F. Tetenev
T. N. Bodrova
A. I. Karzilov
K. F. Tetenev
spellingShingle F. F. Tetenev
T. N. Bodrova
A. I. Karzilov
K. F. Tetenev
WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
Bûlleten' Sibirskoj Mediciny
the theory of diagnosis
quantitative assessment of knowledge
qualitative assessment of knowledge
the clinical thinking
the doctor's knowledge
the doctor's thinking
author_facet F. F. Tetenev
T. N. Bodrova
A. I. Karzilov
K. F. Tetenev
author_sort F. F. Tetenev
title WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
title_short WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
title_full WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
title_fullStr WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
title_full_unstemmed WAYS TO EVALUATE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY OF CLINICAL MEDICI
title_sort ways to evaluate the quantity and quality of knowledge in the study of clinical medici
publisher Siberian State Medical University (Tomsk)
series Bûlleten' Sibirskoj Mediciny
issn 1682-0363
1819-3684
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Analysis of the current literature showed that in publications, in our opinion, there is no master: a scientific analysis of the reasons behind the decline in the quality of knowledge of the doctor, as well as the scientific basis of modern pedagogical technologies introduced in the process of training future doctors to address this problem. Objective and subjective factors are having a negative effect on the quality of the doctor's knowledge. The generally accepted methods of assessing the quality of knowledge – testing and rating system – have their limitations. Testing reflects the level of knowledge about the thinking style of the originator of test tasks. Ranking system for assessing knowledge increasingly characterized by diligence in studying medicine. It is proposed to upgrade the quality of medical knowledge in the teaching of the theory of integration of diagnostics. Amount of knowledge to evaluate the content of educational narrative history of the disease. The quality of the knowledge to assess the content of professional clinical picture comment in the history of the disease.
topic the theory of diagnosis
quantitative assessment of knowledge
qualitative assessment of knowledge
the clinical thinking
the doctor's knowledge
the doctor's thinking
url https://bulletin.tomsk.ru/jour/article/view/237
work_keys_str_mv AT fftetenev waystoevaluatethequantityandqualityofknowledgeinthestudyofclinicalmedici
AT tnbodrova waystoevaluatethequantityandqualityofknowledgeinthestudyofclinicalmedici
AT aikarzilov waystoevaluatethequantityandqualityofknowledgeinthestudyofclinicalmedici
AT kftetenev waystoevaluatethequantityandqualityofknowledgeinthestudyofclinicalmedici
_version_ 1721253497325748224