Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations

Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions. Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice. Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender iden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anton V. Dyachenko, Alexey Y. Perekhov, Victor A. Soldatkin, Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Eco-Vector 2021-05-01
Series:Consortium Psychiatricum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.consortium-psy.com/jour/article/viewFile/68/pdf
id doaj-9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b7168
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b71682021-10-02T19:01:48ZrusEco-VectorConsortium Psychiatricum2712-76722713-29192021-05-0122546410.17816/CP6835Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 InnovationsAnton V. Dyachenko0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-8215Alexey Y. Perekhov1Victor A. Soldatkin2Olga A. Bukhanovskaya3The Medical and Rehabilitation Research center «PHOENIX»Rostov State Medical UniversityRostov State Medical UniversityThe Medical and Rehabilitation Research center «PHOENIX»Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions. Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice. Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender identity disorders is characterized by a variety of terminology, a shift in emphasis from clinical judgement to a socially beneficial normocentric approach and a relatively few advanced, evidence-based research. There is also a lack of evidence for the gender theory underlying the new approach, which raises serious doubts about the validity of the medical and social paradigm revision. In the same time, the position of Russian psychiatrists remains to be more clinically oriented. Conclusion. Patients who declare the desire to reassign their gender have to be assessed by psychiatrists for differential diagnosis to exclude a mental disorder. In such cases, the destigmatization of mental disorders is more critical than the depathologization of gender identity disorders.https://www.consortium-psy.com/jour/article/viewFile/68/pdfgender identity disordersgender dysphoriatranssexualismtransgendergender reassignment
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anton V. Dyachenko
Alexey Y. Perekhov
Victor A. Soldatkin
Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
spellingShingle Anton V. Dyachenko
Alexey Y. Perekhov
Victor A. Soldatkin
Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
Consortium Psychiatricum
gender identity disorders
gender dysphoria
transsexualism
transgender
gender reassignment
author_facet Anton V. Dyachenko
Alexey Y. Perekhov
Victor A. Soldatkin
Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
author_sort Anton V. Dyachenko
title Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_short Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_full Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_fullStr Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_full_unstemmed Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_sort gender identity disorders: current medical and social paradigm and the icd-11 innovations
publisher Eco-Vector
series Consortium Psychiatricum
issn 2712-7672
2713-2919
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions. Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice. Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender identity disorders is characterized by a variety of terminology, a shift in emphasis from clinical judgement to a socially beneficial normocentric approach and a relatively few advanced, evidence-based research. There is also a lack of evidence for the gender theory underlying the new approach, which raises serious doubts about the validity of the medical and social paradigm revision. In the same time, the position of Russian psychiatrists remains to be more clinically oriented. Conclusion. Patients who declare the desire to reassign their gender have to be assessed by psychiatrists for differential diagnosis to exclude a mental disorder. In such cases, the destigmatization of mental disorders is more critical than the depathologization of gender identity disorders.
topic gender identity disorders
gender dysphoria
transsexualism
transgender
gender reassignment
url https://www.consortium-psy.com/jour/article/viewFile/68/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT antonvdyachenko genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations
AT alexeyyperekhov genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations
AT victorasoldatkin genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations
AT olgaabukhanovskaya genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations
_version_ 1716848293107990528