Gender and Student Participation

Active class participation has been associated with student engagement and can be an important aspect of a successful learning experience in college classrooms. Several factors influence student participation including classroom dynamics (such as classroom connectedness, instructor-student rapport)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany C. Leraas, Nicole R. Kippen, Susan J. Larson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing 2018-12-01
Series:Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
sex
Online Access:https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/22849
id doaj-9c1dab52b05f4f07a8d9e6491f0fb17b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c1dab52b05f4f07a8d9e6491f0fb17b2020-11-25T03:36:34ZengIndiana University Office of Scholarly PublishingJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1527-93162018-12-0118410.14434/josotl.v18i4.22849Gender and Student ParticipationBethany C. Leraas0Nicole R. Kippen1Susan J. Larson2Concordia CollegeConcordia CollegeConcordia College Active class participation has been associated with student engagement and can be an important aspect of a successful learning experience in college classrooms. Several factors influence student participation including classroom dynamics (such as classroom connectedness, instructor-student rapport) and individual characteristics (such as biological sex and psychological gender).  With respect to individual characteristics, previous research has evaluated sex differences in participation and has yielded inconsistent findings. The present study investigated the relationship between psychological gender and student participation both in- and out-of-class. Classroom connectedness and professor-student rapport were assessed as possible moderating factors. Results indicated that masculinity and androgyny were associated with more in-class participation while femininity and androgyny were associated with student professor interaction outside of class. While both classroom connectedness and instructor-student rapport were correlated with student participation, there was no evidence of them moderating the relationship between gender and participation. Professor gender type was not associated with student participation. Implications for college classrooms and higher education are discussed. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/22849student participationgendersexrapportconnectedness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bethany C. Leraas
Nicole R. Kippen
Susan J. Larson
spellingShingle Bethany C. Leraas
Nicole R. Kippen
Susan J. Larson
Gender and Student Participation
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
student participation
gender
sex
rapport
connectedness
author_facet Bethany C. Leraas
Nicole R. Kippen
Susan J. Larson
author_sort Bethany C. Leraas
title Gender and Student Participation
title_short Gender and Student Participation
title_full Gender and Student Participation
title_fullStr Gender and Student Participation
title_full_unstemmed Gender and Student Participation
title_sort gender and student participation
publisher Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
series Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1527-9316
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Active class participation has been associated with student engagement and can be an important aspect of a successful learning experience in college classrooms. Several factors influence student participation including classroom dynamics (such as classroom connectedness, instructor-student rapport) and individual characteristics (such as biological sex and psychological gender).  With respect to individual characteristics, previous research has evaluated sex differences in participation and has yielded inconsistent findings. The present study investigated the relationship between psychological gender and student participation both in- and out-of-class. Classroom connectedness and professor-student rapport were assessed as possible moderating factors. Results indicated that masculinity and androgyny were associated with more in-class participation while femininity and androgyny were associated with student professor interaction outside of class. While both classroom connectedness and instructor-student rapport were correlated with student participation, there was no evidence of them moderating the relationship between gender and participation. Professor gender type was not associated with student participation. Implications for college classrooms and higher education are discussed.
topic student participation
gender
sex
rapport
connectedness
url https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/22849
work_keys_str_mv AT bethanycleraas genderandstudentparticipation
AT nicolerkippen genderandstudentparticipation
AT susanjlarson genderandstudentparticipation
_version_ 1724549367491198976