Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods

Several methods of item bias detection indices were introduced in the last decades. The IRT methods were said to be more elegant compared to others. However, due to some practical difficulties, the search for an alternative method is necessary. The purpose of the present study was to compare the abi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah A. AI-Qataee
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: King Saud University 1998-06-01
Series:Journal of Educational Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/v10n21998-3_0.pdf
id doaj-9c214d9307fe4d0b9a4b4472e5e59714
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c214d9307fe4d0b9a4b4472e5e597142020-11-25T02:31:26ZaraKing Saud UniversityJournal of Educational Sciences1658-78631658-76771998-06-01102259296Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection MethodsAbdullah A. AI-QataeeSeveral methods of item bias detection indices were introduced in the last decades. The IRT methods were said to be more elegant compared to others. However, due to some practical difficulties, the search for an alternative method is necessary. The purpose of the present study was to compare the ability of several methods to detect item bias compared to the two parameter IRT models. Thus, DIF methods, the transformed item difficulty (TID) method, chi-square methods, and item discrimination indices were compared using data from the information Subtest for the Normative Sample of the Saudi version of the WISC-R. Sex biases were considered. The results indicate that IRT methods are more elegant than other methods, thus confirming previous findings. Chi-square methods were found to be a good substitute for IRT methods. More specifically, Cammilli chi-square was most effective followed by MH, and Angoff modification of the TID. The new modification of the item discrimination (ID) index seemed to be more effective than the original one. However, further study of the new modification of ID is needed.https://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/v10n21998-3_0.pdfWISC-RIRT methodsDIF methodsChi-square methods
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdullah A. AI-Qataee
spellingShingle Abdullah A. AI-Qataee
Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods
Journal of Educational Sciences
WISC-R
IRT methods
DIF methods
Chi-square methods
author_facet Abdullah A. AI-Qataee
author_sort Abdullah A. AI-Qataee
title Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods
title_short Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods
title_full Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Some Item Bias Detection Methods
title_sort comparative study of some item bias detection methods
publisher King Saud University
series Journal of Educational Sciences
issn 1658-7863
1658-7677
publishDate 1998-06-01
description Several methods of item bias detection indices were introduced in the last decades. The IRT methods were said to be more elegant compared to others. However, due to some practical difficulties, the search for an alternative method is necessary. The purpose of the present study was to compare the ability of several methods to detect item bias compared to the two parameter IRT models. Thus, DIF methods, the transformed item difficulty (TID) method, chi-square methods, and item discrimination indices were compared using data from the information Subtest for the Normative Sample of the Saudi version of the WISC-R. Sex biases were considered. The results indicate that IRT methods are more elegant than other methods, thus confirming previous findings. Chi-square methods were found to be a good substitute for IRT methods. More specifically, Cammilli chi-square was most effective followed by MH, and Angoff modification of the TID. The new modification of the item discrimination (ID) index seemed to be more effective than the original one. However, further study of the new modification of ID is needed.
topic WISC-R
IRT methods
DIF methods
Chi-square methods
url https://jes.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jes.ksu.edu.sa/files/v10n21998-3_0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahaaiqataee comparativestudyofsomeitembiasdetectionmethods
_version_ 1724824602568294400