Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lesion studies in human and non-human primates have linked several different regions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) with the ability to inhibit inappropriate motor responses. However, recent functional neuroimaging studies have specifica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashley Victoria, Swick Diane, Turken And U
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-10-01
Series:BMC Neuroscience
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/102
id doaj-9c2d59dbb81d4171a289d93072ee897c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c2d59dbb81d4171a289d93072ee897c2020-11-25T00:27:21ZengBMCBMC Neuroscience1471-22022008-10-019110210.1186/1471-2202-9-102Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibitionAshley VictoriaSwick DianeTurken And U<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lesion studies in human and non-human primates have linked several different regions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) with the ability to inhibit inappropriate motor responses. However, recent functional neuroimaging studies have specifically implicated right inferior PFC in response inhibition. Right frontal dominance for inhibitory motor control has become a commonly accepted view, although support for this position has not been consistent. Particularly conspicuous is the lack of data on the importance of the homologous region in the left hemisphere. To investigate whether the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is critical for response inhibition, we used neuropsychological methodology with carefully characterized brain lesions in neurological patients.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twelve individuals with damage in the left IFG and the insula were tested in a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. In alternating blocks, the difficulty of response inhibition was easy (50% NoGo trials) or hard (10% NoGo trials). Controls showed the predicted pattern of faster reaction times and more false alarm errors in the hard condition. Left IFG patients had higher error rates than controls in both conditions, but were more impaired in the hard condition, when a greater degree of inhibitory control was required. In contrast, a patient control group with orbitofrontal cortex lesions showed intact performance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Recent neuroimaging studies have focused on a highly specific association between right IFG and inhibitory control. The present results indicate that the integrity of <it>left </it>IFG is also critical for successful implementation of inhibitory control over motor responses. Our findings demonstrate the importance of obtaining converging evidence from multiple methodologies in cognitive neuroscience.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/102
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ashley Victoria
Swick Diane
Turken And U
spellingShingle Ashley Victoria
Swick Diane
Turken And U
Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
BMC Neuroscience
author_facet Ashley Victoria
Swick Diane
Turken And U
author_sort Ashley Victoria
title Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
title_short Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
title_full Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
title_fullStr Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
title_sort left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition
publisher BMC
series BMC Neuroscience
issn 1471-2202
publishDate 2008-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lesion studies in human and non-human primates have linked several different regions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) with the ability to inhibit inappropriate motor responses. However, recent functional neuroimaging studies have specifically implicated right inferior PFC in response inhibition. Right frontal dominance for inhibitory motor control has become a commonly accepted view, although support for this position has not been consistent. Particularly conspicuous is the lack of data on the importance of the homologous region in the left hemisphere. To investigate whether the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is critical for response inhibition, we used neuropsychological methodology with carefully characterized brain lesions in neurological patients.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twelve individuals with damage in the left IFG and the insula were tested in a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. In alternating blocks, the difficulty of response inhibition was easy (50% NoGo trials) or hard (10% NoGo trials). Controls showed the predicted pattern of faster reaction times and more false alarm errors in the hard condition. Left IFG patients had higher error rates than controls in both conditions, but were more impaired in the hard condition, when a greater degree of inhibitory control was required. In contrast, a patient control group with orbitofrontal cortex lesions showed intact performance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Recent neuroimaging studies have focused on a highly specific association between right IFG and inhibitory control. The present results indicate that the integrity of <it>left </it>IFG is also critical for successful implementation of inhibitory control over motor responses. Our findings demonstrate the importance of obtaining converging evidence from multiple methodologies in cognitive neuroscience.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/102
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleyvictoria leftinferiorfrontalgyrusiscriticalforresponseinhibition
AT swickdiane leftinferiorfrontalgyrusiscriticalforresponseinhibition
AT turkenandu leftinferiorfrontalgyrusiscriticalforresponseinhibition
_version_ 1725340444749987840