Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review

Bulang He,1,2 Jeffrey M Hamdorf2 1Liver and Kidney Transplant Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; 2School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Aims: The aim of this paper was to review the current status of laparoscopic/robotic kidney...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He B, Hamdorf JM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2013-09-01
Series:Transplant Research and Risk Management
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/update-on-laparoscopicrobotic-kidney-transplant-a-literature-review-a14306
id doaj-9c375114587c4edebb496b358e71f789
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c375114587c4edebb496b358e71f7892020-11-24T23:54:33ZengDove Medical PressTransplant Research and Risk Management1179-16162013-09-012013default3339Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature reviewHe BHamdorf JMBulang He,1,2 Jeffrey M Hamdorf2 1Liver and Kidney Transplant Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; 2School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Aims: The aim of this paper was to review the current status of laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant and evaluate its feasibility and safety in comparison with conventional standard "open" kidney transplant. Methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library database was performed to identify the papers between January 1980 and June 2013 that reported on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplantation. The terms "laparoscopic kidney/renal transplant" and "robotic kidney/renal transplant (transplantation)" were used. Cross-referencing was also used to find the further publications. Only English language reports were selected and accepted for descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 17 papers and abstracts were retrieved. There were two case-control studies of small volume. High-level evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant with conventional open kidney transplant was not available at the time of this review. Conclusion: The limited published data have suggested that laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant may offer the advantages of less pain, better cosmesis, possible shorter hospital stay, and fewer wound complications, without compromising graft function. Accordingly, some immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, might be able to be commenced earlier, after laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant. The techniques are various at this early stage. A uniformed operative technique may be established in the near future. With refinement of laparoscopic devices, this technique may be widely employed. Further studies will be needed to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant over the conventional open kidney transplant. Keywords: laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgeryhttp://www.dovepress.com/update-on-laparoscopicrobotic-kidney-transplant-a-literature-review-a14306
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author He B
Hamdorf JM
spellingShingle He B
Hamdorf JM
Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
Transplant Research and Risk Management
author_facet He B
Hamdorf JM
author_sort He B
title Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
title_short Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
title_full Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
title_fullStr Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
title_sort update on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant: a literature review
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Transplant Research and Risk Management
issn 1179-1616
publishDate 2013-09-01
description Bulang He,1,2 Jeffrey M Hamdorf2 1Liver and Kidney Transplant Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; 2School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Aims: The aim of this paper was to review the current status of laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant and evaluate its feasibility and safety in comparison with conventional standard "open" kidney transplant. Methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library database was performed to identify the papers between January 1980 and June 2013 that reported on laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplantation. The terms "laparoscopic kidney/renal transplant" and "robotic kidney/renal transplant (transplantation)" were used. Cross-referencing was also used to find the further publications. Only English language reports were selected and accepted for descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 17 papers and abstracts were retrieved. There were two case-control studies of small volume. High-level evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant with conventional open kidney transplant was not available at the time of this review. Conclusion: The limited published data have suggested that laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant may offer the advantages of less pain, better cosmesis, possible shorter hospital stay, and fewer wound complications, without compromising graft function. Accordingly, some immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, might be able to be commenced earlier, after laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant. The techniques are various at this early stage. A uniformed operative technique may be established in the near future. With refinement of laparoscopic devices, this technique may be widely employed. Further studies will be needed to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic/robotic kidney transplant over the conventional open kidney transplant. Keywords: laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery
url http://www.dovepress.com/update-on-laparoscopicrobotic-kidney-transplant-a-literature-review-a14306
work_keys_str_mv AT heb updateonlaparoscopicrobotickidneytransplantaliteraturereview
AT hamdorfjm updateonlaparoscopicrobotickidneytransplantaliteraturereview
_version_ 1716254930991316992