Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test

‘Everything changes and nothing remains still.’ We designed three implicit studies to understand how people react or adapt to a rapidly changing world by testing whether verbal probability is better in expressing changeable uncertainty while numerical probability is better in expressing unchangeable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun eWang, Xue-Lei eDu, Li-Lin eRao, Shu eLi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01313/full
id doaj-9c3c27e45ff8471b987b85082d9679d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c3c27e45ff8471b987b85082d9679d42020-11-24T22:52:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-11-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01313113430Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit TestYun eWang0Yun eWang1Xue-Lei eDu2Xue-Lei eDu3Li-Lin eRao4Shu eLi5Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences‘Everything changes and nothing remains still.’ We designed three implicit studies to understand how people react or adapt to a rapidly changing world by testing whether verbal probability is better in expressing changeable uncertainty while numerical probability is better in expressing unchangeable uncertainty. We found that the ‘verbal-changeable’ combination in implicit tasks was more compatible than the ‘numerical-changeable’ combination. Furthermore, the ‘numerical-changeless’ combination was more compatible than the ‘verbal-changeless’ combination. Thus, a novel feature called ‘changeability’ was proposed to describe the changeable nature of verbal probability. However, numerical probability is a better carrier of changeless uncertainty than verbal probability. These results extend the domain of probability predictions and enrich our general understanding of communication with verbal and numerical probabilities. Given that the world around us is constantly changing, this ‘changeability’ feature may play a major role in preparing for uncertainty.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01313/fullverbal probabilitynumerical probabilitychangeable uncertaintyunchangeable uncertaintychangeability feature
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yun eWang
Yun eWang
Xue-Lei eDu
Xue-Lei eDu
Li-Lin eRao
Shu eLi
spellingShingle Yun eWang
Yun eWang
Xue-Lei eDu
Xue-Lei eDu
Li-Lin eRao
Shu eLi
Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test
Frontiers in Psychology
verbal probability
numerical probability
changeable uncertainty
unchangeable uncertainty
changeability feature
author_facet Yun eWang
Yun eWang
Xue-Lei eDu
Xue-Lei eDu
Li-Lin eRao
Shu eLi
author_sort Yun eWang
title Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test
title_short Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test
title_full Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test
title_fullStr Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test
title_full_unstemmed Probability Expression for Changeable and Changeless Uncertainties: An Implicit Test
title_sort probability expression for changeable and changeless uncertainties: an implicit test
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-11-01
description ‘Everything changes and nothing remains still.’ We designed three implicit studies to understand how people react or adapt to a rapidly changing world by testing whether verbal probability is better in expressing changeable uncertainty while numerical probability is better in expressing unchangeable uncertainty. We found that the ‘verbal-changeable’ combination in implicit tasks was more compatible than the ‘numerical-changeable’ combination. Furthermore, the ‘numerical-changeless’ combination was more compatible than the ‘verbal-changeless’ combination. Thus, a novel feature called ‘changeability’ was proposed to describe the changeable nature of verbal probability. However, numerical probability is a better carrier of changeless uncertainty than verbal probability. These results extend the domain of probability predictions and enrich our general understanding of communication with verbal and numerical probabilities. Given that the world around us is constantly changing, this ‘changeability’ feature may play a major role in preparing for uncertainty.
topic verbal probability
numerical probability
changeable uncertainty
unchangeable uncertainty
changeability feature
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01313/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yunewang probabilityexpressionforchangeableandchangelessuncertaintiesanimplicittest
AT yunewang probabilityexpressionforchangeableandchangelessuncertaintiesanimplicittest
AT xueleiedu probabilityexpressionforchangeableandchangelessuncertaintiesanimplicittest
AT xueleiedu probabilityexpressionforchangeableandchangelessuncertaintiesanimplicittest
AT lilinerao probabilityexpressionforchangeableandchangelessuncertaintiesanimplicittest
AT shueli probabilityexpressionforchangeableandchangelessuncertaintiesanimplicittest
_version_ 1725666255853060096