A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous research on mental health care has shown considerable differences in use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication among different wards and geographical areas. This study investigates to what extent use of seclusio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bjørngaard Johan, Husum Tonje, Finset Arnstein, Ruud Torleif
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-04-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/89
id doaj-9c803e6e27784798bae278e3636df862
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c803e6e27784798bae278e3636df8622020-11-25T00:39:57ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-04-011018910.1186/1472-6963-10-89A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristicsBjørngaard JohanHusum TonjeFinset ArnsteinRuud Torleif<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous research on mental health care has shown considerable differences in use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication among different wards and geographical areas. This study investigates to what extent use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication for involuntary admitted patients in Norwegian acute psychiatric wards is associated with patient, staff and ward characteristics. The study includes data from 32 acute psychiatric wards.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Multilevel logistic regression using Stata was applied with data from 1016 involuntary admitted patients that were linked to data about wards. The sample comprised two hierarchical levels (patients and wards) and the dependent variables had two values (0 = no use and 1 = use). Coercive measures were defined as use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary depot medication during hospitalization.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The total number of involuntary admitted patients was 1214 (35% of total sample). The percentage of patients who were exposed to coercive measures ranged from 0-88% across wards. Of the involuntary admitted patients, 424 (35%) had been secluded, 117 (10%) had been restrained and 113 (9%) had received involuntary depot medication at discharge. Data from 1016 patients could be linked in the multilevel analysis. There was a substantial between-ward variance in the use of coercive measures; however, this was influenced to some extent by compositional differences across wards, especially for the use of restraint.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The substantial between-ward variance, even when adjusting for patients' individual psychopathology, indicates that ward factors influence the use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication and that some wards have the potential for quality improvement. Hence, interventions to reduce the use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication should take into account organizational and environmental factors.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/89
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bjørngaard Johan
Husum Tonje
Finset Arnstein
Ruud Torleif
spellingShingle Bjørngaard Johan
Husum Tonje
Finset Arnstein
Ruud Torleif
A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Bjørngaard Johan
Husum Tonje
Finset Arnstein
Ruud Torleif
author_sort Bjørngaard Johan
title A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
title_short A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
title_full A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
title_fullStr A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
title_sort cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2010-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous research on mental health care has shown considerable differences in use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication among different wards and geographical areas. This study investigates to what extent use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication for involuntary admitted patients in Norwegian acute psychiatric wards is associated with patient, staff and ward characteristics. The study includes data from 32 acute psychiatric wards.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Multilevel logistic regression using Stata was applied with data from 1016 involuntary admitted patients that were linked to data about wards. The sample comprised two hierarchical levels (patients and wards) and the dependent variables had two values (0 = no use and 1 = use). Coercive measures were defined as use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary depot medication during hospitalization.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The total number of involuntary admitted patients was 1214 (35% of total sample). The percentage of patients who were exposed to coercive measures ranged from 0-88% across wards. Of the involuntary admitted patients, 424 (35%) had been secluded, 117 (10%) had been restrained and 113 (9%) had received involuntary depot medication at discharge. Data from 1016 patients could be linked in the multilevel analysis. There was a substantial between-ward variance in the use of coercive measures; however, this was influenced to some extent by compositional differences across wards, especially for the use of restraint.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The substantial between-ward variance, even when adjusting for patients' individual psychopathology, indicates that ward factors influence the use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication and that some wards have the potential for quality improvement. Hence, interventions to reduce the use of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication should take into account organizational and environmental factors.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/89
work_keys_str_mv AT bjørngaardjohan acrosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT husumtonje acrosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT finsetarnstein acrosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT ruudtorleif acrosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT bjørngaardjohan crosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT husumtonje crosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT finsetarnstein crosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
AT ruudtorleif crosssectionalprospectivestudyofseclusionrestraintandinvoluntarymedicationinacutepsychiatricwardspatientstaffandwardcharacteristics
_version_ 1725292272588685312