Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Climov Daniela, Beco Jacques, Bex Michèle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-10-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/4/15
id doaj-9c84800d637d44e68e981a8f5d446ae8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9c84800d637d44e68e981a8f5d446ae82020-11-25T00:08:03ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822004-10-01411510.1186/1471-2482-4-15Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case seriesClimov DanielaBeco JacquesBex Michèle<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve decompression (PND) on the symptoms of the PCS, on three clinical signs (abnormal sensibility, painful Alcock's canal, painful "skin rolling test") and on two neurophysiological tests: electromyography (EMG) and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML). The second aim was to study the clinical value of the aforementioned clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this retrospective analysis, the studied sample comprised 74 female patients who underwent a bilateral PND between 1995 and 2002. To accomplish the first aim, the patients sample was compared before and at least one year after surgery by means of descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. The second aim was achieved by means of a statistical comparison between the patient's group before the operation and a control group of 82 women without any of the following signs: prolapse, anal incontinence, perineodynia, dyschesia and history of pelvi-perineal surgery.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>When bilateral PND was the only procedure done to treat the symptoms, the cure rates of perineodynia, anal incontinence and urinary incontinence were 8/14, 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. The frequency of the three clinical signs was significantly reduced. There was a significant reduction of anal and perineal PNTML and a significant increase of anal richness on EMG. The Odd Ratio of the three clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS was 16,97 (95% CI = 4,68 – 61,51).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study suggests that bilateral PND can treat perineodynia, anal and urinary incontinence. The three clinical signs of PCS seem to be efficient to suspect this diagnosis. There is a need for further studies to confirm these preliminary results.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/4/15
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Climov Daniela
Beco Jacques
Bex Michèle
spellingShingle Climov Daniela
Beco Jacques
Bex Michèle
Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
BMC Surgery
author_facet Climov Daniela
Beco Jacques
Bex Michèle
author_sort Climov Daniela
title Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
title_short Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
title_full Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
title_fullStr Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
title_full_unstemmed Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
title_sort pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series
publisher BMC
series BMC Surgery
issn 1471-2482
publishDate 2004-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve decompression (PND) on the symptoms of the PCS, on three clinical signs (abnormal sensibility, painful Alcock's canal, painful "skin rolling test") and on two neurophysiological tests: electromyography (EMG) and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML). The second aim was to study the clinical value of the aforementioned clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this retrospective analysis, the studied sample comprised 74 female patients who underwent a bilateral PND between 1995 and 2002. To accomplish the first aim, the patients sample was compared before and at least one year after surgery by means of descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. The second aim was achieved by means of a statistical comparison between the patient's group before the operation and a control group of 82 women without any of the following signs: prolapse, anal incontinence, perineodynia, dyschesia and history of pelvi-perineal surgery.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>When bilateral PND was the only procedure done to treat the symptoms, the cure rates of perineodynia, anal incontinence and urinary incontinence were 8/14, 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. The frequency of the three clinical signs was significantly reduced. There was a significant reduction of anal and perineal PNTML and a significant increase of anal richness on EMG. The Odd Ratio of the three clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS was 16,97 (95% CI = 4,68 – 61,51).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study suggests that bilateral PND can treat perineodynia, anal and urinary incontinence. The three clinical signs of PCS seem to be efficient to suspect this diagnosis. There is a need for further studies to confirm these preliminary results.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/4/15
work_keys_str_mv AT climovdaniela pudendalnervedecompressioninperineologyacaseseries
AT becojacques pudendalnervedecompressioninperineologyacaseseries
AT bexmichele pudendalnervedecompressioninperineologyacaseseries
_version_ 1725417027132194816