Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia

Payments for Environmental Services (PES) are instruments which seem well suited for forest conservation. However, their impact on reducing deforestation might be weakened by negligible additionality and leakage effects; the first refers to the low variation in net deforestation rates even in the ab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando Gordillo, Paul Eguiguren, Margret Köthke, Rubén Ferrer Velasco, Peter Elsasser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
PES
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/906
id doaj-9cae3b6241b449b4a1fdc0ec1b0dceb8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9cae3b6241b449b4a1fdc0ec1b0dceb82021-07-23T13:41:17ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-07-011290690610.3390/f12070906Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian AmazoniaFernando Gordillo0Paul Eguiguren1Margret Köthke2Rubén Ferrer Velasco3Peter Elsasser4Thünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics, 21031 Hamburg, GermanyCarrera de Ingeniería Forestal, Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales del Ambiente y Biodiversidad, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Loja 110111, EcuadorThünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics, 21031 Hamburg, GermanyThünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics, 21031 Hamburg, GermanyThünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics, 21031 Hamburg, GermanyPayments for Environmental Services (PES) are instruments which seem well suited for forest conservation. However, their impact on reducing deforestation might be weakened by negligible additionality and leakage effects; the first refers to the low variation in net deforestation rates even in the absence of PES, and the second refers to the displaced deforestation behavior to other areas not covered by PES. For the case of Ecuador, we examine both issues by assessing the historical deforestation trend of selected PES-enrolled areas and that of their adjacent areas to identify deforestation patterns before and after PES implementation. We analyze the additional effect of PES on reducing deforestation by comparison to a baseline as well as to comparable reference sites at two different spatial scales. We also analyze potential leakage effects of PES by comparing deforestation development in adjacent areas. We show that PES has achieved marginally low conservation impacts in enrolled areas with an average difference in net deforestation rates of 0.02 percent points over a period of 28 years. Overall, PES-enrolled areas depict lower annual net deforestation rates than unenrolled areas, albeit at a negligible rate, and there is also some evidence that deforestation decreased in adjacent areas after PES implementation. Additionally, there exists a statistically significant linear increasing deforestation trend in adjacent areas as distance increases from the PES-enrolled area. Our empirical results, however, raise the suspicion that the choice of PES-enrolled areas might have been influenced by self-selection.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/906deforestationadditionalityleakageself-selectionPESEcuador
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernando Gordillo
Paul Eguiguren
Margret Köthke
Rubén Ferrer Velasco
Peter Elsasser
spellingShingle Fernando Gordillo
Paul Eguiguren
Margret Köthke
Rubén Ferrer Velasco
Peter Elsasser
Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia
Forests
deforestation
additionality
leakage
self-selection
PES
Ecuador
author_facet Fernando Gordillo
Paul Eguiguren
Margret Köthke
Rubén Ferrer Velasco
Peter Elsasser
author_sort Fernando Gordillo
title Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia
title_short Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia
title_full Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia
title_fullStr Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia
title_full_unstemmed Additionality and Leakage Resulting from PES Implementation? Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazonia
title_sort additionality and leakage resulting from pes implementation? evidence from the ecuadorian amazonia
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Payments for Environmental Services (PES) are instruments which seem well suited for forest conservation. However, their impact on reducing deforestation might be weakened by negligible additionality and leakage effects; the first refers to the low variation in net deforestation rates even in the absence of PES, and the second refers to the displaced deforestation behavior to other areas not covered by PES. For the case of Ecuador, we examine both issues by assessing the historical deforestation trend of selected PES-enrolled areas and that of their adjacent areas to identify deforestation patterns before and after PES implementation. We analyze the additional effect of PES on reducing deforestation by comparison to a baseline as well as to comparable reference sites at two different spatial scales. We also analyze potential leakage effects of PES by comparing deforestation development in adjacent areas. We show that PES has achieved marginally low conservation impacts in enrolled areas with an average difference in net deforestation rates of 0.02 percent points over a period of 28 years. Overall, PES-enrolled areas depict lower annual net deforestation rates than unenrolled areas, albeit at a negligible rate, and there is also some evidence that deforestation decreased in adjacent areas after PES implementation. Additionally, there exists a statistically significant linear increasing deforestation trend in adjacent areas as distance increases from the PES-enrolled area. Our empirical results, however, raise the suspicion that the choice of PES-enrolled areas might have been influenced by self-selection.
topic deforestation
additionality
leakage
self-selection
PES
Ecuador
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/906
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandogordillo additionalityandleakageresultingfrompesimplementationevidencefromtheecuadorianamazonia
AT pauleguiguren additionalityandleakageresultingfrompesimplementationevidencefromtheecuadorianamazonia
AT margretkothke additionalityandleakageresultingfrompesimplementationevidencefromtheecuadorianamazonia
AT rubenferrervelasco additionalityandleakageresultingfrompesimplementationevidencefromtheecuadorianamazonia
AT peterelsasser additionalityandleakageresultingfrompesimplementationevidencefromtheecuadorianamazonia
_version_ 1721288375635279872