Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics

There is significant interest in the development and application of deep neural networks (DNNs) to neuroimaging data. A growing literature suggests that DNNs outperform their classical counterparts in a variety of neuroimaging applications, yet there are few direct comparisons of relative utility. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tong He, Ru Kong, Avram J. Holmes, Minh Nguyen, Mert R. Sabuncu, Simon B. Eickhoff, Danilo Bzdok, Jiashi Feng, B.T. Thomas Yeo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-02-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919308675
id doaj-9cccf15fbb91438d8f3da5484dcddbb8
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tong He
Ru Kong
Avram J. Holmes
Minh Nguyen
Mert R. Sabuncu
Simon B. Eickhoff
Danilo Bzdok
Jiashi Feng
B.T. Thomas Yeo
spellingShingle Tong He
Ru Kong
Avram J. Holmes
Minh Nguyen
Mert R. Sabuncu
Simon B. Eickhoff
Danilo Bzdok
Jiashi Feng
B.T. Thomas Yeo
Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
NeuroImage
Fingerprinting
Deep learning
Resting-state fMRI
Graph convolutional neural network
Kernel ridge regression
author_facet Tong He
Ru Kong
Avram J. Holmes
Minh Nguyen
Mert R. Sabuncu
Simon B. Eickhoff
Danilo Bzdok
Jiashi Feng
B.T. Thomas Yeo
author_sort Tong He
title Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
title_short Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
title_full Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
title_fullStr Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
title_full_unstemmed Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
title_sort deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2020-02-01
description There is significant interest in the development and application of deep neural networks (DNNs) to neuroimaging data. A growing literature suggests that DNNs outperform their classical counterparts in a variety of neuroimaging applications, yet there are few direct comparisons of relative utility. Here, we compared the performance of three DNN architectures and a classical machine learning algorithm (kernel regression) in predicting individual phenotypes from whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) patterns. One of the DNNs was a generic fully-connected feedforward neural network, while the other two DNNs were recently published approaches specifically designed to exploit the structure of connectome data. By using a combined sample of almost 10,000 participants from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and UK Biobank, we showed that the three DNNs and kernel regression achieved similar performance across a wide range of behavioral and demographic measures. Furthermore, the generic feedforward neural network exhibited similar performance to the two state-of-the-art connectome-specific DNNs. When predicting fluid intelligence in the UK Biobank, performance of all algorithms dramatically improved when sample size increased from 100 to 1000 subjects. Improvement was smaller, but still significant, when sample size increased from 1000 to 5000 subjects. Importantly, kernel regression was competitive across all sample sizes. Overall, our study suggests that kernel regression is as effective as DNNs for RSFC-based behavioral prediction, while incurring significantly lower computational costs. Therefore, kernel regression might serve as a useful baseline algorithm for future studies.
topic Fingerprinting
Deep learning
Resting-state fMRI
Graph convolutional neural network
Kernel ridge regression
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919308675
work_keys_str_mv AT tonghe deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT rukong deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT avramjholmes deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT minhnguyen deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT mertrsabuncu deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT simonbeickhoff deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT danilobzdok deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT jiashifeng deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
AT btthomasyeo deepneuralnetworksandkernelregressionachievecomparableaccuraciesforfunctionalconnectivitypredictionofbehavioranddemographics
_version_ 1724689752594055168
spelling doaj-9cccf15fbb91438d8f3da5484dcddbb82020-11-25T03:02:24ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722020-02-01206116276Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographicsTong He0Ru Kong1Avram J. Holmes2Minh Nguyen3Mert R. Sabuncu4Simon B. Eickhoff5Danilo Bzdok6Jiashi Feng7B.T. Thomas Yeo8Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, SingaporeClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, SingaporeDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USAClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USAInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany; JARA-BRAIN, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance, Germany; Parietal Team, INRIA, Neurospin, Bat 145, CEA Saclay, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, SingaporeClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Corresponding author. ECE, CIRC, N.1 & MNP, National University of Singapore, Singapore.There is significant interest in the development and application of deep neural networks (DNNs) to neuroimaging data. A growing literature suggests that DNNs outperform their classical counterparts in a variety of neuroimaging applications, yet there are few direct comparisons of relative utility. Here, we compared the performance of three DNN architectures and a classical machine learning algorithm (kernel regression) in predicting individual phenotypes from whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) patterns. One of the DNNs was a generic fully-connected feedforward neural network, while the other two DNNs were recently published approaches specifically designed to exploit the structure of connectome data. By using a combined sample of almost 10,000 participants from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and UK Biobank, we showed that the three DNNs and kernel regression achieved similar performance across a wide range of behavioral and demographic measures. Furthermore, the generic feedforward neural network exhibited similar performance to the two state-of-the-art connectome-specific DNNs. When predicting fluid intelligence in the UK Biobank, performance of all algorithms dramatically improved when sample size increased from 100 to 1000 subjects. Improvement was smaller, but still significant, when sample size increased from 1000 to 5000 subjects. Importantly, kernel regression was competitive across all sample sizes. Overall, our study suggests that kernel regression is as effective as DNNs for RSFC-based behavioral prediction, while incurring significantly lower computational costs. Therefore, kernel regression might serve as a useful baseline algorithm for future studies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919308675FingerprintingDeep learningResting-state fMRIGraph convolutional neural networkKernel ridge regression