Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background No previous study directly compares the fixed day-5 initiation versus the flexible initiation of GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI for those patients who are predicted as high ovarian responders without PCOS. To evaluate whether the number of oocytes retrieved is differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiu Luo, Li Pei, Fujie Li, Chunli Li, Guoning Huang, Hong Ye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03833-2
id doaj-9d48bf5e22d447b3896f92dbecfeb662
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d48bf5e22d447b3896f92dbecfeb6622021-05-09T11:17:43ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-05-012111710.1186/s12884-021-03833-2Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trialXiu Luo0Li Pei1Fujie Li2Chunli Li3Guoning Huang4Hong Ye5Chongqing Key Laboratory of Human embryo EngineeringChongqing Clinical Research Center for Reproductive MedicineChongqing Key Laboratory of Human embryo EngineeringReproductive and Genetic Institute, Chongqing Health Center for Women and ChildrenChongqing Key Laboratory of Human embryo EngineeringChongqing Key Laboratory of Human embryo EngineeringAbstract Background No previous study directly compares the fixed day-5 initiation versus the flexible initiation of GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI for those patients who are predicted as high ovarian responders without PCOS. To evaluate whether the number of oocytes retrieved is different by using the two GnRH antagonist protocols in Chinese women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS. Methods A randomized controlled trial of 201 infertile women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization. Ovary stimulation was performed using recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. GnRH antagonist ganirelix (0.25 mg/d) was started either on day 5 of stimulation (fixed group) or when LH was > 10 IU/L, and/or a follicle with mean diameter > 12 mm was present, and/or serum E2 was > 600 pg/ml. Patient monitoring was initiated on day 3 of stimulation in flexible group. Result(s) No significant difference was observed between the fixed and flexible groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (16.72 ± 7.25 vs. 17.47 ± 5.88, P = 0.421), the Gonadotropin treatment duration (9.53 ± 1.07 vs. 9.67 ± 1.03, P = 0.346) and total Gonadotropin dose (1427.75 ± 210.6 vs. 1455.94 ± 243.44, P = 0.381). GnRH antagonist treatment duration in fixed protocol was statistically longer than the flexible protocol (6.57 ± 1.17 vs 6.04 ± 1.03, P = 0.001). There was no premature LH surge in either protocol. Conclusion(s) Fixed GnRH antagonist administration on day 5 of stimulation appear to achieve a comparable oocyte retrieved compared with flexible antagonist administration. Trial registration NCT02635607 posted on December 16, 2015 in clinicaltrials.gov.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03833-2Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonistsIn vitro fertilizationFixed protocolFlexible protocolNumber of oocytes retrieved
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiu Luo
Li Pei
Fujie Li
Chunli Li
Guoning Huang
Hong Ye
spellingShingle Xiu Luo
Li Pei
Fujie Li
Chunli Li
Guoning Huang
Hong Ye
Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists
In vitro fertilization
Fixed protocol
Flexible protocol
Number of oocytes retrieved
author_facet Xiu Luo
Li Pei
Fujie Li
Chunli Li
Guoning Huang
Hong Ye
author_sort Xiu Luo
title Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except pcos: a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background No previous study directly compares the fixed day-5 initiation versus the flexible initiation of GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI for those patients who are predicted as high ovarian responders without PCOS. To evaluate whether the number of oocytes retrieved is different by using the two GnRH antagonist protocols in Chinese women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS. Methods A randomized controlled trial of 201 infertile women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization. Ovary stimulation was performed using recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. GnRH antagonist ganirelix (0.25 mg/d) was started either on day 5 of stimulation (fixed group) or when LH was > 10 IU/L, and/or a follicle with mean diameter > 12 mm was present, and/or serum E2 was > 600 pg/ml. Patient monitoring was initiated on day 3 of stimulation in flexible group. Result(s) No significant difference was observed between the fixed and flexible groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (16.72 ± 7.25 vs. 17.47 ± 5.88, P = 0.421), the Gonadotropin treatment duration (9.53 ± 1.07 vs. 9.67 ± 1.03, P = 0.346) and total Gonadotropin dose (1427.75 ± 210.6 vs. 1455.94 ± 243.44, P = 0.381). GnRH antagonist treatment duration in fixed protocol was statistically longer than the flexible protocol (6.57 ± 1.17 vs 6.04 ± 1.03, P = 0.001). There was no premature LH surge in either protocol. Conclusion(s) Fixed GnRH antagonist administration on day 5 of stimulation appear to achieve a comparable oocyte retrieved compared with flexible antagonist administration. Trial registration NCT02635607 posted on December 16, 2015 in clinicaltrials.gov.
topic Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists
In vitro fertilization
Fixed protocol
Flexible protocol
Number of oocytes retrieved
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03833-2
work_keys_str_mv AT xiuluo fixedversusflexibleantagonistprotocolinwomenwithpredictedhighovarianresponseexceptpcosarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lipei fixedversusflexibleantagonistprotocolinwomenwithpredictedhighovarianresponseexceptpcosarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fujieli fixedversusflexibleantagonistprotocolinwomenwithpredictedhighovarianresponseexceptpcosarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chunlili fixedversusflexibleantagonistprotocolinwomenwithpredictedhighovarianresponseexceptpcosarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guoninghuang fixedversusflexibleantagonistprotocolinwomenwithpredictedhighovarianresponseexceptpcosarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hongye fixedversusflexibleantagonistprotocolinwomenwithpredictedhighovarianresponseexceptpcosarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721454517928591360