Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones

In situ bioremediation (ISB) can be a low-cost approach for accelerating remediation timelines at sites impacted with dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE). To achieve high rates of biologicallyenhanced dissolution, electron donor needs to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michaye McMaster, Carmen LeBron, Rebecca Daprato, Cory Repta, David Major
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas 2011-01-01
Series:Revista Águas Subterrâneas
Online Access:https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28178
id doaj-9d52fb8a93a548ce8b5d3bf5c8069cd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d52fb8a93a548ce8b5d3bf5c8069cd62020-11-24T20:44:19ZengAssociação Brasileira de Águas SubterrâneasRevista Águas Subterrâneas0101-70042179-97842011-01-010016763Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source ZonesMichaye McMaster0Carmen LeBron1Rebecca Daprato2Cory Repta3David Major4Geosyntec ConsultantsNavy Facilities Engineering Service CentreGeosyntec ConsultantsGeosyntec ConsultantsGeosyntec ConsultantsIn situ bioremediation (ISB) can be a low-cost approach for accelerating remediation timelines at sites impacted with dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE). To achieve high rates of biologicallyenhanced dissolution, electron donor needs to be delivered, as well as sustained at an effective concentration at the DNAPL:water interface for the growth of and consumption by dechlorinating biomass. Electron donors such as lactate and emulsified vegetable oils (EVO) are consumed as they migrate towards source zones by non-dechlorinating biomass. Typical electron donor applications have only 1 to 10% efficiency. Hence, typical applications have accounted for the loss of reducing equivalents with the addition of a five to ten times the amount of electron donor required as a safety factor. Adding high concentrations of electron donor may overcome these limitations by allowing higher concentrations of electron donor to reach the DNAPL:water interface; however, this will in turn increase the application cost significantly. Improving electron donors may be a way to reduce costs for source zones. The presentation will present a summary of a demonstration completed to verify that bioremediation could be used to treat a PCE DNAPL source area and a new electron donor being investigated to improve donor delivery to source areas.https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28178
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michaye McMaster
Carmen LeBron
Rebecca Daprato
Cory Repta
David Major
spellingShingle Michaye McMaster
Carmen LeBron
Rebecca Daprato
Cory Repta
David Major
Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones
Revista Águas Subterrâneas
author_facet Michaye McMaster
Carmen LeBron
Rebecca Daprato
Cory Repta
David Major
author_sort Michaye McMaster
title Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones
title_short Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones
title_full Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones
title_fullStr Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation in Source Zones
title_sort enhanced in situ bioremediation in source zones
publisher Associação Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas
series Revista Águas Subterrâneas
issn 0101-7004
2179-9784
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In situ bioremediation (ISB) can be a low-cost approach for accelerating remediation timelines at sites impacted with dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE). To achieve high rates of biologicallyenhanced dissolution, electron donor needs to be delivered, as well as sustained at an effective concentration at the DNAPL:water interface for the growth of and consumption by dechlorinating biomass. Electron donors such as lactate and emulsified vegetable oils (EVO) are consumed as they migrate towards source zones by non-dechlorinating biomass. Typical electron donor applications have only 1 to 10% efficiency. Hence, typical applications have accounted for the loss of reducing equivalents with the addition of a five to ten times the amount of electron donor required as a safety factor. Adding high concentrations of electron donor may overcome these limitations by allowing higher concentrations of electron donor to reach the DNAPL:water interface; however, this will in turn increase the application cost significantly. Improving electron donors may be a way to reduce costs for source zones. The presentation will present a summary of a demonstration completed to verify that bioremediation could be used to treat a PCE DNAPL source area and a new electron donor being investigated to improve donor delivery to source areas.
url https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28178
work_keys_str_mv AT michayemcmaster enhancedinsitubioremediationinsourcezones
AT carmenlebron enhancedinsitubioremediationinsourcezones
AT rebeccadaprato enhancedinsitubioremediationinsourcezones
AT coryrepta enhancedinsitubioremediationinsourcezones
AT davidmajor enhancedinsitubioremediationinsourcezones
_version_ 1716817654914744320