Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points

Introduction. The skin resistivity (SkR) measurement is commonly recommended for acupoints measurement, but for trigger points (TrPs) only one study is available. The purpose of the study was to evaluate SkR for latent TrPs compared to non-TrPs and the surrounding tissue. Material and Methods. Forty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elżbieta Skorupska, Jarosław Zawadziński, Agata Bednarek, Włodzimierz Samborski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/351726
id doaj-9d96adcfc05a4bceb97878a21882335d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9d96adcfc05a4bceb97878a21882335d2020-11-24T20:59:42ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/351726351726Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger PointsElżbieta Skorupska0Jarosław Zawadziński1Agata Bednarek2Włodzimierz Samborski3Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1958r., 60-545 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Bionics and Bioimpedance, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Parkowa 2, 60-775 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1958r., 60-545 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1958r., 60-545 Poznań, PolandIntroduction. The skin resistivity (SkR) measurement is commonly recommended for acupoints measurement, but for trigger points (TrPs) only one study is available. The purpose of the study was to evaluate SkR for latent TrPs compared to non-TrPs and the surrounding tissue. Material and Methods. Forty-two healthy volunteers with unilateral latent upper trapezius TrPs (12 men, 30 women) aged 21–23 (mean age: 22.1 ± 0.6 y) participated in the study. Keithley electrometer 610B was used for measuring SkR (Ag/AgCl self-adhesive, disposable ground electrode: 30 mm diameter). SkR was measured for latent TrPs and compared to opposite non-TrPs sites and the surrounding tissue. Results. The SkR decrease of TrPs-positive sites as compared to TrPs-negative sites and the surrounding tissue was confirmed. However, no statistically significant difference in the SkR value occurred when all data were analyzed. The same was confirmed after gender division and for TrPs-positive subjects examined for referred pain and twitch response presence. Conclusion. SkR reactive changes at latent TrPs are possible but the results were not consistent with the previous study. Thus, caution in applying SkR to latent TrPs isolation is recommended and its clinical use should not be encouraged yet. Further studies, especially on active TrPs, are yet required.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/351726
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elżbieta Skorupska
Jarosław Zawadziński
Agata Bednarek
Włodzimierz Samborski
spellingShingle Elżbieta Skorupska
Jarosław Zawadziński
Agata Bednarek
Włodzimierz Samborski
Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points
BioMed Research International
author_facet Elżbieta Skorupska
Jarosław Zawadziński
Agata Bednarek
Włodzimierz Samborski
author_sort Elżbieta Skorupska
title Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points
title_short Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points
title_full Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points
title_fullStr Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points
title_full_unstemmed Skin Resistivity Value of Upper Trapezius Latent Trigger Points
title_sort skin resistivity value of upper trapezius latent trigger points
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Introduction. The skin resistivity (SkR) measurement is commonly recommended for acupoints measurement, but for trigger points (TrPs) only one study is available. The purpose of the study was to evaluate SkR for latent TrPs compared to non-TrPs and the surrounding tissue. Material and Methods. Forty-two healthy volunteers with unilateral latent upper trapezius TrPs (12 men, 30 women) aged 21–23 (mean age: 22.1 ± 0.6 y) participated in the study. Keithley electrometer 610B was used for measuring SkR (Ag/AgCl self-adhesive, disposable ground electrode: 30 mm diameter). SkR was measured for latent TrPs and compared to opposite non-TrPs sites and the surrounding tissue. Results. The SkR decrease of TrPs-positive sites as compared to TrPs-negative sites and the surrounding tissue was confirmed. However, no statistically significant difference in the SkR value occurred when all data were analyzed. The same was confirmed after gender division and for TrPs-positive subjects examined for referred pain and twitch response presence. Conclusion. SkR reactive changes at latent TrPs are possible but the results were not consistent with the previous study. Thus, caution in applying SkR to latent TrPs isolation is recommended and its clinical use should not be encouraged yet. Further studies, especially on active TrPs, are yet required.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/351726
work_keys_str_mv AT elzbietaskorupska skinresistivityvalueofuppertrapeziuslatenttriggerpoints
AT jarosławzawadzinski skinresistivityvalueofuppertrapeziuslatenttriggerpoints
AT agatabednarek skinresistivityvalueofuppertrapeziuslatenttriggerpoints
AT włodzimierzsamborski skinresistivityvalueofuppertrapeziuslatenttriggerpoints
_version_ 1716781889092583424