Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2016-07-01
|
Series: | حیات |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1417-en.html |
id |
doaj-9dd406b730134c5189e6280091525bc2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9dd406b730134c5189e6280091525bc22021-09-26T10:29:57ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesحیات1735-22152008-188X2016-07-01222102114Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practiceMina Mohammady0Leila Janani1 Dept. of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Dept. of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is selection bias. The best way to reduce selection bias is the use of random allocation. The aim of this study is to provide comprehensive, practical and simple information regarding proper implementation of the random allocation process in randomized clinical trials. Methods & Materials: A review study was performed using available resources and comprehensive analysis. For this purpose, we searched the relevant books & articles in databases including Medline, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Magiran. Key words were randomization, random sequence, allocation concealment, randomized controlled trial, randomized clinical trial, and bias. Results: From the literature review, we obtained 39 articles and one relevant book that their findings were presented in a simple language with practical examples in three parts including random sequences generation, random allocation concealment and implementation. Conclusion: Selection bias in clinical trials has an adverse effect on the accuracy of results. In order to avoid it, researchers should employ proper methods in randomization and random allocation concealment, and report it in their articles properly. Therefore, researchers can obtain valid results through a better understanding of randomization and its proper implementation.http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1417-en.htmlrandomized clinical trialsrandomized controlled trialsrandom allocationselection bias |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mina Mohammady Leila Janani |
spellingShingle |
Mina Mohammady Leila Janani Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice حیات randomized clinical trials randomized controlled trials random allocation selection bias |
author_facet |
Mina Mohammady Leila Janani |
author_sort |
Mina Mohammady |
title |
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice |
title_short |
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice |
title_full |
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice |
title_fullStr |
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice |
title_sort |
randomization in randomized clinical trials: from theory to practice |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
حیات |
issn |
1735-2215 2008-188X |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is selection bias. The best way to reduce selection bias is the use of random allocation. The aim of this study is to provide comprehensive, practical and simple information regarding proper implementation of the random allocation process in randomized clinical trials.
Methods & Materials: A review study was performed using available resources and comprehensive analysis. For this purpose, we searched the relevant books & articles in databases including Medline, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Magiran. Key words were randomization, random sequence, allocation concealment, randomized controlled trial, randomized clinical trial, and bias.
Results: From the literature review, we obtained 39 articles and one relevant book that their findings were presented in a simple language with practical examples in three parts including random sequences generation, random allocation concealment and implementation.
Conclusion: Selection bias in clinical trials has an adverse effect on the accuracy of results. In order to avoid it, researchers should employ proper methods in randomization and random allocation concealment, and report it in their articles properly. Therefore, researchers can obtain valid results through a better understanding of randomization and its proper implementation. |
topic |
randomized clinical trials randomized controlled trials random allocation selection bias |
url |
http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1417-en.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minamohammady randomizationinrandomizedclinicaltrialsfromtheorytopractice AT leilajanani randomizationinrandomizedclinicaltrialsfromtheorytopractice |
_version_ |
1716868259418996736 |