Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice

Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mina Mohammady, Leila Janani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-07-01
Series:حیات
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1417-en.html
id doaj-9dd406b730134c5189e6280091525bc2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9dd406b730134c5189e6280091525bc22021-09-26T10:29:57ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesحیات1735-22152008-188X2016-07-01222102114Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practiceMina Mohammady0Leila Janani1 Dept. of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Dept. of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is selection bias. The best way to reduce selection bias is the use of random allocation. The aim of this study is to provide comprehensive, practical and simple information regarding proper implementation of the random allocation process in randomized clinical trials. Methods & Materials: A review study was performed using available resources and comprehensive analysis. For this purpose, we searched the relevant books & articles in databases including Medline, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Magiran. Key words were randomization, random sequence, allocation concealment, randomized controlled trial, randomized clinical trial, and bias. Results: From the literature review, we obtained 39 articles and one relevant book that their findings were presented in a simple language with practical examples in three parts including random sequences generation, random allocation concealment and implementation. Conclusion: Selection bias in clinical trials has an adverse effect on the accuracy of results. In order to avoid it, researchers should employ proper methods in randomization and random allocation concealment, and report it in their articles properly. Therefore, researchers can obtain valid results through a better understanding of randomization and its proper implementation.http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1417-en.htmlrandomized clinical trialsrandomized controlled trialsrandom allocationselection bias
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mina Mohammady
Leila Janani
spellingShingle Mina Mohammady
Leila Janani
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
حیات
randomized clinical trials
randomized controlled trials
random allocation
selection bias
author_facet Mina Mohammady
Leila Janani
author_sort Mina Mohammady
title Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
title_short Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
title_full Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
title_fullStr Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
title_full_unstemmed Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
title_sort randomization in randomized clinical trials: from theory to practice
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series حیات
issn 1735-2215
2008-188X
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is selection bias. The best way to reduce selection bias is the use of random allocation. The aim of this study is to provide comprehensive, practical and simple information regarding proper implementation of the random allocation process in randomized clinical trials. Methods & Materials: A review study was performed using available resources and comprehensive analysis. For this purpose, we searched the relevant books & articles in databases including Medline, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Magiran. Key words were randomization, random sequence, allocation concealment, randomized controlled trial, randomized clinical trial, and bias. Results: From the literature review, we obtained 39 articles and one relevant book that their findings were presented in a simple language with practical examples in three parts including random sequences generation, random allocation concealment and implementation. Conclusion: Selection bias in clinical trials has an adverse effect on the accuracy of results. In order to avoid it, researchers should employ proper methods in randomization and random allocation concealment, and report it in their articles properly. Therefore, researchers can obtain valid results through a better understanding of randomization and its proper implementation.
topic randomized clinical trials
randomized controlled trials
random allocation
selection bias
url http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1417-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT minamohammady randomizationinrandomizedclinicaltrialsfromtheorytopractice
AT leilajanani randomizationinrandomizedclinicaltrialsfromtheorytopractice
_version_ 1716868259418996736