Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process

The removal mechanisms of silicate using an aluminum hydroxide co-precipitation process was investigated and compared with an adsorption process, in order to establish an effective and validated method for silicate removal from wastewater. Adsorption isotherms, XRD and FT-IR analyses showed that si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiharu Tokoro, Shinya Suzuki, Daisuke Haraguchi, Sayaka Izawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-02-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/7/2/1084
id doaj-9e23bfbf804b483cb7567e61846ba7f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e23bfbf804b483cb7567e61846ba7f22020-11-24T23:55:23ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442014-02-01721084109610.3390/ma7021084ma7021084Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation ProcessChiharu Tokoro0Shinya Suzuki1Daisuke Haraguchi2Sayaka Izawa3Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, JapanGraduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, JapanGraduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, JapanGraduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, JapanThe removal mechanisms of silicate using an aluminum hydroxide co-precipitation process was investigated and compared with an adsorption process, in order to establish an effective and validated method for silicate removal from wastewater. Adsorption isotherms, XRD and FT-IR analyses showed that silicate uptake occurred by adsorption to boehmite for initial Si/Al molar ratios smaller than two, but by precipitation of poorly crystalline kaolinite for the ratios larger than two, in both co-precipitation and adsorption processes. Silicate was removed by two steps: (i) an initial rapid uptake in a few seconds; and (ii) a slow uptake over several hours in both processes. The uptake rate in the first step was higher in the co-precipitation process than in adsorption process, presumably due to increased silicate adsorption to boehmite and rapid precipitation of kaolinite. These results suggest that silicate removal using aluminum salts could be effectively achieved if the pH adjustment and aluminum concentration are strictly controlled.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/7/2/1084co-precipitationadsorptionaluminum hydroxideboehmitekaolinitesorption density
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chiharu Tokoro
Shinya Suzuki
Daisuke Haraguchi
Sayaka Izawa
spellingShingle Chiharu Tokoro
Shinya Suzuki
Daisuke Haraguchi
Sayaka Izawa
Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process
Materials
co-precipitation
adsorption
aluminum hydroxide
boehmite
kaolinite
sorption density
author_facet Chiharu Tokoro
Shinya Suzuki
Daisuke Haraguchi
Sayaka Izawa
author_sort Chiharu Tokoro
title Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process
title_short Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process
title_full Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process
title_fullStr Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process
title_full_unstemmed Silicate Removal in Aluminum Hydroxide Co-Precipitation Process
title_sort silicate removal in aluminum hydroxide co-precipitation process
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2014-02-01
description The removal mechanisms of silicate using an aluminum hydroxide co-precipitation process was investigated and compared with an adsorption process, in order to establish an effective and validated method for silicate removal from wastewater. Adsorption isotherms, XRD and FT-IR analyses showed that silicate uptake occurred by adsorption to boehmite for initial Si/Al molar ratios smaller than two, but by precipitation of poorly crystalline kaolinite for the ratios larger than two, in both co-precipitation and adsorption processes. Silicate was removed by two steps: (i) an initial rapid uptake in a few seconds; and (ii) a slow uptake over several hours in both processes. The uptake rate in the first step was higher in the co-precipitation process than in adsorption process, presumably due to increased silicate adsorption to boehmite and rapid precipitation of kaolinite. These results suggest that silicate removal using aluminum salts could be effectively achieved if the pH adjustment and aluminum concentration are strictly controlled.
topic co-precipitation
adsorption
aluminum hydroxide
boehmite
kaolinite
sorption density
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/7/2/1084
work_keys_str_mv AT chiharutokoro silicateremovalinaluminumhydroxidecoprecipitationprocess
AT shinyasuzuki silicateremovalinaluminumhydroxidecoprecipitationprocess
AT daisukeharaguchi silicateremovalinaluminumhydroxidecoprecipitationprocess
AT sayakaizawa silicateremovalinaluminumhydroxidecoprecipitationprocess
_version_ 1725462784146145280