Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?

Online discussions between citizens have been subject to scholarly debate and several empirical studies for a substantial period of time. Scholars have envisioned these as potential venues for citizens’ deliberation. Often, however, empirical findings do not support these notions. The quality of dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim Strandberg, Janne Berg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade (CECS) 2013-11-01
Series:Comunicação e Sociedade
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistacomsoc.pt/article/view/980
id doaj-9e33d18fdebf43a8bfe4f80203b903b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e33d18fdebf43a8bfe4f80203b903b32020-11-25T02:33:57ZengCentro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade (CECS)Comunicação e Sociedade1645-20892183-35752013-11-012313215210.17231/comsoc.23(2013).1618980Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?Kim Strandberg0Janne Berg1Åbo Akademi University (Finland)Åbo Akademi University (Finland)Online discussions between citizens have been subject to scholarly debate and several empirical studies for a substantial period of time. Scholars have envisioned these as potential venues for citizens’ deliberation. Often, however, empirical findings do not support these notions. The quality of discussion is often not up to the standards of truly deliberative discussions. Nonetheless, there are strains of evidence suggesting that online discussion venues applying facilitators, fixed topics and actively enforcing discussion rules, may avoid many of the problems with discussion quality. This article therefore examines whether readers’ comments on a Finnish newspaper’s website resemble democratic conversations. During the course of three weeks in spring 2010, we content analyze 300 reader comments. Our findings indicate that although there are strains of democratic conversations to be found in online reader comments, there are also many instances in which the opposite holds true.https://revistacomsoc.pt/article/view/980Public sphereonline reader commentsonline deliberationdemocratic conversationsFinland
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kim Strandberg
Janne Berg
spellingShingle Kim Strandberg
Janne Berg
Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?
Comunicação e Sociedade
Public sphere
online reader comments
online deliberation
democratic conversations
Finland
author_facet Kim Strandberg
Janne Berg
author_sort Kim Strandberg
title Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?
title_short Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?
title_full Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?
title_fullStr Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?
title_full_unstemmed Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments - Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?
title_sort online newspapers’ readers’ comments - democratic conversation platforms or virtual soapboxes?
publisher Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade (CECS)
series Comunicação e Sociedade
issn 1645-2089
2183-3575
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Online discussions between citizens have been subject to scholarly debate and several empirical studies for a substantial period of time. Scholars have envisioned these as potential venues for citizens’ deliberation. Often, however, empirical findings do not support these notions. The quality of discussion is often not up to the standards of truly deliberative discussions. Nonetheless, there are strains of evidence suggesting that online discussion venues applying facilitators, fixed topics and actively enforcing discussion rules, may avoid many of the problems with discussion quality. This article therefore examines whether readers’ comments on a Finnish newspaper’s website resemble democratic conversations. During the course of three weeks in spring 2010, we content analyze 300 reader comments. Our findings indicate that although there are strains of democratic conversations to be found in online reader comments, there are also many instances in which the opposite holds true.
topic Public sphere
online reader comments
online deliberation
democratic conversations
Finland
url https://revistacomsoc.pt/article/view/980
work_keys_str_mv AT kimstrandberg onlinenewspapersreaderscommentsdemocraticconversationplatformsorvirtualsoapboxes
AT janneberg onlinenewspapersreaderscommentsdemocraticconversationplatformsorvirtualsoapboxes
_version_ 1724811304073428992