The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present

Military actions of allies in the Crimean War of 1853-1856 had the coalition character, and therefore it is quite problematic to evaluate the contribution of individual troops objectively. At the national historical schools, as well as in public opinion of the state, the army’s participation and its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Semen N. Osipovskiy
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Volgograd State University 2016-12-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1290
id doaj-9e3dadb93779441f9f2ba421e1dbc6d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e3dadb93779441f9f2ba421e1dbc6d32020-11-24T21:19:18ZrusVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ1998-99382312-87042016-12-0121671110.15688/jvolsu4.2016.6.1The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the PresentSemen N. Osipovskiy0Sevastopol State UniversityMilitary actions of allies in the Crimean War of 1853-1856 had the coalition character, and therefore it is quite problematic to evaluate the contribution of individual troops objectively. At the national historical schools, as well as in public opinion of the state, the army’s participation and its contribution in the course of military operations are actualized. This trend has been common both in the war years and today. The imaginary and the real successes of the army are highly appreciated, and it is impossible to do this without downgrading the role of allies in the coalition. The evaluation of Ottoman troops’ behavior during the Balaklava battle in the Crimean War may serve as an example of such ambiguity. This article deals with the problem of ambiguity of contribution made by the armed forces of the Ottoman Empire to the military operations of the Crimean war in the context of existing assessments. On the one hand, the behavior of the Ottoman forces does not give reasons for the low evaluation of their fighting qualities. On the other hand, current attempts to form an image of the Egyptian contingent as one of the main conflict factors seem to be very far from reality.http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1290Ottoman EmpireCrimean WarBalaklavaRussellEgyptarmySevastopol
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Semen N. Osipovskiy
spellingShingle Semen N. Osipovskiy
The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
Ottoman Empire
Crimean War
Balaklava
Russell
Egypt
army
Sevastopol
author_facet Semen N. Osipovskiy
author_sort Semen N. Osipovskiy
title The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present
title_short The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present
title_full The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present
title_fullStr The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present
title_full_unstemmed The Armed Forces of the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War: Evaluating in the Past and in the Present
title_sort armed forces of the ottoman empire in the crimean war: evaluating in the past and in the present
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
issn 1998-9938
2312-8704
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Military actions of allies in the Crimean War of 1853-1856 had the coalition character, and therefore it is quite problematic to evaluate the contribution of individual troops objectively. At the national historical schools, as well as in public opinion of the state, the army’s participation and its contribution in the course of military operations are actualized. This trend has been common both in the war years and today. The imaginary and the real successes of the army are highly appreciated, and it is impossible to do this without downgrading the role of allies in the coalition. The evaluation of Ottoman troops’ behavior during the Balaklava battle in the Crimean War may serve as an example of such ambiguity. This article deals with the problem of ambiguity of contribution made by the armed forces of the Ottoman Empire to the military operations of the Crimean war in the context of existing assessments. On the one hand, the behavior of the Ottoman forces does not give reasons for the low evaluation of their fighting qualities. On the other hand, current attempts to form an image of the Egyptian contingent as one of the main conflict factors seem to be very far from reality.
topic Ottoman Empire
Crimean War
Balaklava
Russell
Egypt
army
Sevastopol
url http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1290
work_keys_str_mv AT semennosipovskiy thearmedforcesoftheottomanempireinthecrimeanwarevaluatinginthepastandinthepresent
AT semennosipovskiy armedforcesoftheottomanempireinthecrimeanwarevaluatinginthepastandinthepresent
_version_ 1726006057689415680