Colliding ideals – an interview study of how intervention researchers address adherence and adaptations in replication studies
Abstract Background For an intervention to be considered evidence-based, findings need to be replicated. When this is done in new contexts (e.g., a new country), adaptations may be needed. Yet, we know little about how researchers approach this. This study aims to explore how researchers reason abou...
Main Authors: | Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrika Förberg, Knut Sundell, Henna Hasson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0496-8 |
Similar Items
-
The Value Equation: Three complementary propositions for reconciling fidelity and adaptation in evidence-based practice implementation
by: Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Understanding the value of adhering to or adapting evidence-based interventions: a study protocol of a discrete choice experiment
by: Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Professionals’ management of the fidelity–adaptation dilemma in the use of evidence-based interventions—an intervention study
by: Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
by: Henna Hasson, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Adherence and characteristics of participants enrolled in a standardised programme of patient education and exercises for low back pain, GLA:D® Back – a prospective observational study
by: Inge Ris, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)