The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers

Background. Brain metastases (BMs) from digestive cancers are rare; therefore, no optimal treatment modality has been defined. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 68257 patients with digestive cancers. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient backgrounds betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Dong, Liyan Wu, Fang Wang, Jinsheng Huang, Pili Hu, Bei Zhang, Liang-ping Xia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Oncology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1568465
id doaj-9e90ebac23604c84bf82efd17aabe9d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e90ebac23604c84bf82efd17aabe9d62020-11-24T21:50:07ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Oncology1687-84501687-84692019-01-01201910.1155/2019/15684651568465The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive CancersJun Dong0Liyan Wu1Fang Wang2Jinsheng Huang3Pili Hu4Bei Zhang5Liang-ping Xia6Department of Intergrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, East Dong Feng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 74, Zhong Shan Er Lu, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, Zhong Shan Er Lu, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaDepartment of Intergrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, East Dong Feng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaDepartment of Intergrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, East Dong Feng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaDepartment of Intergrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, East Dong Feng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaDepartment of Intergrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, East Dong Feng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, ChinaBackground. Brain metastases (BMs) from digestive cancers are rare; therefore, no optimal treatment modality has been defined. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 68257 patients with digestive cancers. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient backgrounds between groups. Survival differences between different treatment modalities were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed to identify prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). Results. 270 patients with BM entered the study. In the entire group, the median survival time after diagnosis of brain metastases was 10.25 months (95% CI: 8.41–12.09 months); local treatment could significantly prolong OS (respectively, P<0.01; even after PSM, P<0.01); combination treatment was more effective than single treatment modality (respectively, P<0.01; even after PSM, P<0.01). However, each combination modality was identically effective (P>0.05). When patients were divided into three groups based on 1, 2-3, or more than 3 metastatic lesion(s), same results were identified between local treatment and without local treatment (1 lesion, P<0.01; 2-3 lesions, P<0.01; more than 3 lesions, P<0.01, respectively) and combination and single treatment (P<0.01, P=0.02, P=0.03, respectively). However, there was no difference between different combined treatments (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status (P<0.01), presence of extracranial metastasis (P=0.04), number of BM (P<0.01), and local treatment for BM (P<0.01) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions. Regardless of the number of brain lesions, local treatment achieved higher overall survival times than no local treatment, and combination therapy could offer survival benefit to patients as compared with single therapy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1568465
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun Dong
Liyan Wu
Fang Wang
Jinsheng Huang
Pili Hu
Bei Zhang
Liang-ping Xia
spellingShingle Jun Dong
Liyan Wu
Fang Wang
Jinsheng Huang
Pili Hu
Bei Zhang
Liang-ping Xia
The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers
Journal of Oncology
author_facet Jun Dong
Liyan Wu
Fang Wang
Jinsheng Huang
Pili Hu
Bei Zhang
Liang-ping Xia
author_sort Jun Dong
title The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers
title_short The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers
title_full The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers
title_fullStr The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers
title_full_unstemmed The Choice of Local Treatment Modalities for Patients with Brain Metastases from Digestive Cancers
title_sort choice of local treatment modalities for patients with brain metastases from digestive cancers
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Oncology
issn 1687-8450
1687-8469
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background. Brain metastases (BMs) from digestive cancers are rare; therefore, no optimal treatment modality has been defined. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 68257 patients with digestive cancers. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient backgrounds between groups. Survival differences between different treatment modalities were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed to identify prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). Results. 270 patients with BM entered the study. In the entire group, the median survival time after diagnosis of brain metastases was 10.25 months (95% CI: 8.41–12.09 months); local treatment could significantly prolong OS (respectively, P<0.01; even after PSM, P<0.01); combination treatment was more effective than single treatment modality (respectively, P<0.01; even after PSM, P<0.01). However, each combination modality was identically effective (P>0.05). When patients were divided into three groups based on 1, 2-3, or more than 3 metastatic lesion(s), same results were identified between local treatment and without local treatment (1 lesion, P<0.01; 2-3 lesions, P<0.01; more than 3 lesions, P<0.01, respectively) and combination and single treatment (P<0.01, P=0.02, P=0.03, respectively). However, there was no difference between different combined treatments (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status (P<0.01), presence of extracranial metastasis (P=0.04), number of BM (P<0.01), and local treatment for BM (P<0.01) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions. Regardless of the number of brain lesions, local treatment achieved higher overall survival times than no local treatment, and combination therapy could offer survival benefit to patients as compared with single therapy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1568465
work_keys_str_mv AT jundong thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT liyanwu thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT fangwang thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT jinshenghuang thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT pilihu thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT beizhang thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT liangpingxia thechoiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT jundong choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT liyanwu choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT fangwang choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT jinshenghuang choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT pilihu choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT beizhang choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
AT liangpingxia choiceoflocaltreatmentmodalitiesforpatientswithbrainmetastasesfromdigestivecancers
_version_ 1725885207158980608