Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive

The signs of School dropout in Physical Education (PE) are beaded or repeated absences often based on statements simulated or not unsuited “exemptions”. These rather feminine absences often benefit from complacency on behalf of adults: parents, school nurses, doctors. As part of a research program,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacques Méard
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Provence 2016-07-01
Series:Questions Vives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1871
id doaj-9e92538ac2294abc8d0d28c6da9e3648
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e92538ac2294abc8d0d28c6da9e36482020-11-24T20:48:58ZfraUniversité de ProvenceQuestions Vives1635-40791775-433X2016-07-012510.4000/questionsvives.1871Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportiveJacques MéardThe signs of School dropout in Physical Education (PE) are beaded or repeated absences often based on statements simulated or not unsuited “exemptions”. These rather feminine absences often benefit from complacency on behalf of adults: parents, school nurses, doctors. As part of a research program, we tried to understand the possible PE dropout prevention characteristics by analyzing the activity of four college teachers for 18 lessons, through direct method tools (observations, semi-structured interviews, informal interviews) and indirect method tools (“instructions to the double”, self-confrontation interviews). The study shows that the activity of the classroom teacher bears similarities with other teachers as regard of dropout prevention. Concerning the management of “PE exemptions” negotiations between students and teachers can be tough and based on joint decisions to all teachers and displayed or taken individually. From there, the forms of dropout prevention in PE appear as a sign of the vitality or lack of vitality of collective labor among PE teachers.http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1871décrochage scolaireenseignementclinique de l’activitédéveloppement professionnelcollectif de travaildropout
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacques Méard
spellingShingle Jacques Méard
Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
Questions Vives
décrochage scolaire
enseignement
clinique de l’activité
développement professionnel
collectif de travail
dropout
author_facet Jacques Méard
author_sort Jacques Méard
title Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
title_short Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
title_full Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
title_fullStr Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
title_full_unstemmed Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
title_sort le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
publisher Université de Provence
series Questions Vives
issn 1635-4079
1775-433X
publishDate 2016-07-01
description The signs of School dropout in Physical Education (PE) are beaded or repeated absences often based on statements simulated or not unsuited “exemptions”. These rather feminine absences often benefit from complacency on behalf of adults: parents, school nurses, doctors. As part of a research program, we tried to understand the possible PE dropout prevention characteristics by analyzing the activity of four college teachers for 18 lessons, through direct method tools (observations, semi-structured interviews, informal interviews) and indirect method tools (“instructions to the double”, self-confrontation interviews). The study shows that the activity of the classroom teacher bears similarities with other teachers as regard of dropout prevention. Concerning the management of “PE exemptions” negotiations between students and teachers can be tough and based on joint decisions to all teachers and displayed or taken individually. From there, the forms of dropout prevention in PE appear as a sign of the vitality or lack of vitality of collective labor among PE teachers.
topic décrochage scolaire
enseignement
clinique de l’activité
développement professionnel
collectif de travail
dropout
url http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1871
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquesmeard lecollectifdetravailaucentredesdispositifsdepreventiondudecrochagedeseleveseneducationphysiqueetsportive
_version_ 1716807260993224704