Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive
The signs of School dropout in Physical Education (PE) are beaded or repeated absences often based on statements simulated or not unsuited “exemptions”. These rather feminine absences often benefit from complacency on behalf of adults: parents, school nurses, doctors. As part of a research program,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Université de Provence
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Questions Vives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1871 |
id |
doaj-9e92538ac2294abc8d0d28c6da9e3648 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9e92538ac2294abc8d0d28c6da9e36482020-11-24T20:48:58ZfraUniversité de ProvenceQuestions Vives1635-40791775-433X2016-07-012510.4000/questionsvives.1871Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportiveJacques MéardThe signs of School dropout in Physical Education (PE) are beaded or repeated absences often based on statements simulated or not unsuited “exemptions”. These rather feminine absences often benefit from complacency on behalf of adults: parents, school nurses, doctors. As part of a research program, we tried to understand the possible PE dropout prevention characteristics by analyzing the activity of four college teachers for 18 lessons, through direct method tools (observations, semi-structured interviews, informal interviews) and indirect method tools (“instructions to the double”, self-confrontation interviews). The study shows that the activity of the classroom teacher bears similarities with other teachers as regard of dropout prevention. Concerning the management of “PE exemptions” negotiations between students and teachers can be tough and based on joint decisions to all teachers and displayed or taken individually. From there, the forms of dropout prevention in PE appear as a sign of the vitality or lack of vitality of collective labor among PE teachers.http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1871décrochage scolaireenseignementclinique de l’activitédéveloppement professionnelcollectif de travaildropout |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jacques Méard |
spellingShingle |
Jacques Méard Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive Questions Vives décrochage scolaire enseignement clinique de l’activité développement professionnel collectif de travail dropout |
author_facet |
Jacques Méard |
author_sort |
Jacques Méard |
title |
Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive |
title_short |
Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive |
title_full |
Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive |
title_fullStr |
Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive |
title_full_unstemmed |
Le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive |
title_sort |
le collectif de travail au centre des dispositifs de prévention du décrochage des élèves en éducation physique et sportive |
publisher |
Université de Provence |
series |
Questions Vives |
issn |
1635-4079 1775-433X |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
The signs of School dropout in Physical Education (PE) are beaded or repeated absences often based on statements simulated or not unsuited “exemptions”. These rather feminine absences often benefit from complacency on behalf of adults: parents, school nurses, doctors. As part of a research program, we tried to understand the possible PE dropout prevention characteristics by analyzing the activity of four college teachers for 18 lessons, through direct method tools (observations, semi-structured interviews, informal interviews) and indirect method tools (“instructions to the double”, self-confrontation interviews). The study shows that the activity of the classroom teacher bears similarities with other teachers as regard of dropout prevention. Concerning the management of “PE exemptions” negotiations between students and teachers can be tough and based on joint decisions to all teachers and displayed or taken individually. From there, the forms of dropout prevention in PE appear as a sign of the vitality or lack of vitality of collective labor among PE teachers. |
topic |
décrochage scolaire enseignement clinique de l’activité développement professionnel collectif de travail dropout |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1871 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacquesmeard lecollectifdetravailaucentredesdispositifsdepreventiondudecrochagedeseleveseneducationphysiqueetsportive |
_version_ |
1716807260993224704 |