Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence

The goals of this study were to estimate the prevalence of feather picking (FP) in Italian pet parrots and evaluate the risk factors and possible ethological correlation. A web survey was created and addressed to owners of all species of companion parrots, distributed through on line parrots associa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pierluca Costa, Elisabetta Macchi, Laura Tomassone, Fulvio Ricceri, Enrico Bollo, Frine Eleonora Scaglione, Martina Tarantola, Michele De Marco, Liviana Prola, Domenico Bergero, Achille Schiavone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-07-01
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2016.1195711
id doaj-9e9a881ff1f24f6cba9bd91c93628567
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e9a881ff1f24f6cba9bd91c936285672021-06-25T10:30:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X2016-07-0115347348010.1080/1828051X.2016.11957111195711Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidencePierluca Costa0Elisabetta Macchi1Laura Tomassone2Fulvio Ricceri3Enrico Bollo4Frine Eleonora Scaglione5Martina Tarantola6Michele De Marco7Liviana Prola8Domenico Bergero9Achille Schiavone10University of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoUniversity of TorinoThe goals of this study were to estimate the prevalence of feather picking (FP) in Italian pet parrots and evaluate the risk factors and possible ethological correlation. A web survey was created and addressed to owners of all species of companion parrots, distributed through on line parrots association websites, social networks and by mail. The survey was available for compilation from June to October 2014. In 292 compiled surveys, 20 different parrots genera were indicated; Psittacus spp. (24.3%), Agapornis spp. (19.5%), Nymphicus hollandicus (18.0%) and Amazona spp. (9.0%) were the most represented species. Our study showed a FP prevalence of 17.5%, with the highest prevalence in Agapornis spp. (26.3%) and Psittacus spp. (22.5%). Living with other parrots was positively associated to FP (p < 0.05), such as being fed in neonatal age and weaned by the breeder and not by the final owner (p < 0.001). Moreover, 2.9% of non-FP parrots and 10.0% of FP parrots lived always caged (p = 0.06). A significant difference in the feather picking site was detected (p < 0.001). The most affected body region was the chest (58.8%), followed by the rump (41.2%) and under wing regions (25.4%). At the same time, we conducted another study to better understand some information from the hand-raised parrots through a comparison with the parent-raised parrots. We recorded 1488 parent-raised parrots, and only 1.3% were affected by feather loss. This finding confirm that FP is be considered a multi-factorial behavioral pathology in which factors of different origin may cause behavioral disorders associated to self-injuries.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2016.1195711avian behaviourbehavioral disorderfeather pickingparrotpsittacine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pierluca Costa
Elisabetta Macchi
Laura Tomassone
Fulvio Ricceri
Enrico Bollo
Frine Eleonora Scaglione
Martina Tarantola
Michele De Marco
Liviana Prola
Domenico Bergero
Achille Schiavone
spellingShingle Pierluca Costa
Elisabetta Macchi
Laura Tomassone
Fulvio Ricceri
Enrico Bollo
Frine Eleonora Scaglione
Martina Tarantola
Michele De Marco
Liviana Prola
Domenico Bergero
Achille Schiavone
Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
Italian Journal of Animal Science
avian behaviour
behavioral disorder
feather picking
parrot
psittacine
author_facet Pierluca Costa
Elisabetta Macchi
Laura Tomassone
Fulvio Ricceri
Enrico Bollo
Frine Eleonora Scaglione
Martina Tarantola
Michele De Marco
Liviana Prola
Domenico Bergero
Achille Schiavone
author_sort Pierluca Costa
title Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
title_short Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
title_full Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
title_fullStr Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
title_full_unstemmed Feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
title_sort feather picking in pet parrots: sensitive species, risk factor and ethological evidence
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
publishDate 2016-07-01
description The goals of this study were to estimate the prevalence of feather picking (FP) in Italian pet parrots and evaluate the risk factors and possible ethological correlation. A web survey was created and addressed to owners of all species of companion parrots, distributed through on line parrots association websites, social networks and by mail. The survey was available for compilation from June to October 2014. In 292 compiled surveys, 20 different parrots genera were indicated; Psittacus spp. (24.3%), Agapornis spp. (19.5%), Nymphicus hollandicus (18.0%) and Amazona spp. (9.0%) were the most represented species. Our study showed a FP prevalence of 17.5%, with the highest prevalence in Agapornis spp. (26.3%) and Psittacus spp. (22.5%). Living with other parrots was positively associated to FP (p < 0.05), such as being fed in neonatal age and weaned by the breeder and not by the final owner (p < 0.001). Moreover, 2.9% of non-FP parrots and 10.0% of FP parrots lived always caged (p = 0.06). A significant difference in the feather picking site was detected (p < 0.001). The most affected body region was the chest (58.8%), followed by the rump (41.2%) and under wing regions (25.4%). At the same time, we conducted another study to better understand some information from the hand-raised parrots through a comparison with the parent-raised parrots. We recorded 1488 parent-raised parrots, and only 1.3% were affected by feather loss. This finding confirm that FP is be considered a multi-factorial behavioral pathology in which factors of different origin may cause behavioral disorders associated to self-injuries.
topic avian behaviour
behavioral disorder
feather picking
parrot
psittacine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2016.1195711
work_keys_str_mv AT pierlucacosta featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT elisabettamacchi featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT lauratomassone featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT fulvioricceri featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT enricobollo featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT frineeleonorascaglione featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT martinatarantola featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT micheledemarco featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT livianaprola featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT domenicobergero featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
AT achilleschiavone featherpickinginpetparrotssensitivespeciesriskfactorandethologicalevidence
_version_ 1721360035675635712