Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems

<p/> <p>It is increasingly difficult to satisfy growing demands for spectrum with the conventional policy of fixed spectrum allocation. To overcome this problem, flexible/dynamic spectrum sharing methods that can significantly improve spectrum utilization of the spectrum have gained incr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burgkhardt Dennis, Jondral FriedrichK, Cosovic Ivan, Yamada Takefumi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2008-01-01
Series:EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Online Access:http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/598080
id doaj-9eb0332fd7814ca58b9978b802231a10
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9eb0332fd7814ca58b9978b802231a102020-11-25T02:25:22ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking1687-14721687-14992008-01-0120081598080Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing SystemsBurgkhardt DennisJondral FriedrichKCosovic IvanYamada Takefumi<p/> <p>It is increasingly difficult to satisfy growing demands for spectrum with the conventional policy of fixed spectrum allocation. To overcome this problem, flexible/dynamic spectrum sharing methods that can significantly improve spectrum utilization of the spectrum have gained increasing interest recently. This paper presents two dynamic spectrum sharing approaches, a centralized and a decentralized one. The centralized approach is based on hierarchical trading. Each level of hierarchy is composed of "markets" that are associated with a certain spatial area and trading occurrence frequency, whereas area size and trading occurrence frequency depend on the hierarchy level. The decentralized approach is based on game-theory. There, it is assumed that the operators are averse to unequal payoffs and act unselfishly, enabling a stable and sustainable community. Numerical results show that, in the observed scenario, both proposals outperform the reference case of fixed resource allocation significantly in terms of utilized bandwidth. Whereas, negotiation costs for spectrum brokerage appear in the centralized approach, nonnegligible amounts of spectrum are lost in the decentralized approach due to collisions. Thus, a hybrid of centralized and decentralized approach that exploits the benefits of both is also considered.</p>http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/598080
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Burgkhardt Dennis
Jondral FriedrichK
Cosovic Ivan
Yamada Takefumi
spellingShingle Burgkhardt Dennis
Jondral FriedrichK
Cosovic Ivan
Yamada Takefumi
Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
author_facet Burgkhardt Dennis
Jondral FriedrichK
Cosovic Ivan
Yamada Takefumi
author_sort Burgkhardt Dennis
title Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems
title_short Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems
title_full Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems
title_fullStr Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems
title_full_unstemmed Resource Distribution Approaches in Spectrum Sharing Systems
title_sort resource distribution approaches in spectrum sharing systems
publisher SpringerOpen
series EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
issn 1687-1472
1687-1499
publishDate 2008-01-01
description <p/> <p>It is increasingly difficult to satisfy growing demands for spectrum with the conventional policy of fixed spectrum allocation. To overcome this problem, flexible/dynamic spectrum sharing methods that can significantly improve spectrum utilization of the spectrum have gained increasing interest recently. This paper presents two dynamic spectrum sharing approaches, a centralized and a decentralized one. The centralized approach is based on hierarchical trading. Each level of hierarchy is composed of "markets" that are associated with a certain spatial area and trading occurrence frequency, whereas area size and trading occurrence frequency depend on the hierarchy level. The decentralized approach is based on game-theory. There, it is assumed that the operators are averse to unequal payoffs and act unselfishly, enabling a stable and sustainable community. Numerical results show that, in the observed scenario, both proposals outperform the reference case of fixed resource allocation significantly in terms of utilized bandwidth. Whereas, negotiation costs for spectrum brokerage appear in the centralized approach, nonnegligible amounts of spectrum are lost in the decentralized approach due to collisions. Thus, a hybrid of centralized and decentralized approach that exploits the benefits of both is also considered.</p>
url http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/598080
work_keys_str_mv AT burgkhardtdennis resourcedistributionapproachesinspectrumsharingsystems
AT jondralfriedrichk resourcedistributionapproachesinspectrumsharingsystems
AT cosovicivan resourcedistributionapproachesinspectrumsharingsystems
AT yamadatakefumi resourcedistributionapproachesinspectrumsharingsystems
_version_ 1724851665101651968