Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment

Advanced thermal control technologies have been continuously developed to complement conventional models and algorithms to improve their performance regarding control accuracy and energy efficiency. This study analyses the strengths and weaknesses of simultaneous controls for the amount of air and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee-Yong Sung, Jonghoon Ahn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1089
id doaj-9ec88c4d00a8478e95c63b306ba029fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ec88c4d00a8478e95c63b306ba029fb2020-11-25T01:40:49ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-03-01135108910.3390/en13051089en13051089Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal EnvironmentLee-Yong Sung0Jonghoon Ahn1Department of Architecture, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, KoreaSchool of Architecture and Design Convergence, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, KoreaAdvanced thermal control technologies have been continuously developed to complement conventional models and algorithms to improve their performance regarding control accuracy and energy efficiency. This study analyses the strengths and weaknesses of simultaneous controls for the amount of air and its temperature by use of on-demand and predictive control strategies responding to two different outdoor conditions. The framework performs the comparative analyses of an on-demand model, which reacts immediately to indoor conditions, and a predictive model, which provides reference signals derived from data learned. Two models are combined to make a comparison of how much more efficient the combined model operates than each model when abnormal situations occur. As a result, when the two models are combined, its efficiency improves from 20.0% to 33.6% for indoor thermal dissatisfaction and from 13.0% to 44.5% for energy use, respectively. This result implies that in addition to creating new algorithms to cope with any abnormal situation, combining existing models can also be a resource-saving approach.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1089indoor thermal controlenergy usethermal environmenton-demand modelpredictive modelartificial neural network
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lee-Yong Sung
Jonghoon Ahn
spellingShingle Lee-Yong Sung
Jonghoon Ahn
Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment
Energies
indoor thermal control
energy use
thermal environment
on-demand model
predictive model
artificial neural network
author_facet Lee-Yong Sung
Jonghoon Ahn
author_sort Lee-Yong Sung
title Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment
title_short Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment
title_full Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment
title_fullStr Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analyses of Energy Efficiency between on-Demand and Predictive Controls for Buildings’ Indoor Thermal Environment
title_sort comparative analyses of energy efficiency between on-demand and predictive controls for buildings’ indoor thermal environment
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Advanced thermal control technologies have been continuously developed to complement conventional models and algorithms to improve their performance regarding control accuracy and energy efficiency. This study analyses the strengths and weaknesses of simultaneous controls for the amount of air and its temperature by use of on-demand and predictive control strategies responding to two different outdoor conditions. The framework performs the comparative analyses of an on-demand model, which reacts immediately to indoor conditions, and a predictive model, which provides reference signals derived from data learned. Two models are combined to make a comparison of how much more efficient the combined model operates than each model when abnormal situations occur. As a result, when the two models are combined, its efficiency improves from 20.0% to 33.6% for indoor thermal dissatisfaction and from 13.0% to 44.5% for energy use, respectively. This result implies that in addition to creating new algorithms to cope with any abnormal situation, combining existing models can also be a resource-saving approach.
topic indoor thermal control
energy use
thermal environment
on-demand model
predictive model
artificial neural network
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1089
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyongsung comparativeanalysesofenergyefficiencybetweenondemandandpredictivecontrolsforbuildingsindoorthermalenvironment
AT jonghoonahn comparativeanalysesofenergyefficiencybetweenondemandandpredictivecontrolsforbuildingsindoorthermalenvironment
_version_ 1725043473415929856