Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement

Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The k...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan van Drongelen, Mariska Wesseling, Jana Holder, Andrea Meurer, Felix Stief
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030/full
id doaj-9ed51be1d29b4c0989c7803f38d8154c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ed51be1d29b4c0989c7803f38d8154c2020-11-25T03:40:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852020-09-01810.3389/fbioe.2020.578030578030Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip ReplacementStefan van Drongelen0Mariska Wesseling1Jana Holder2Andrea Meurer3Felix Stief4Felix Stief5Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Research Unit for Osteoarthritis, Orthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Frankfurt, GermanyHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumOrthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Frankfurt, GermanyOrthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Frankfurt, GermanyOrthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Frankfurt, GermanyGoethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyReduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030/fulljoint contact forcesmusculoskeletal modelingtotal hip replacementknee adduction momentwalkingosteoarthritis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan van Drongelen
Mariska Wesseling
Jana Holder
Andrea Meurer
Felix Stief
Felix Stief
spellingShingle Stefan van Drongelen
Mariska Wesseling
Jana Holder
Andrea Meurer
Felix Stief
Felix Stief
Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
joint contact forces
musculoskeletal modeling
total hip replacement
knee adduction moment
walking
osteoarthritis
author_facet Stefan van Drongelen
Mariska Wesseling
Jana Holder
Andrea Meurer
Felix Stief
Felix Stief
author_sort Stefan van Drongelen
title Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_short Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_full Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_fullStr Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_sort knee load distribution in hip osteoarthritis patients after total hip replacement
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
issn 2296-4185
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment.
topic joint contact forces
musculoskeletal modeling
total hip replacement
knee adduction moment
walking
osteoarthritis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanvandrongelen kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT mariskawesseling kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT janaholder kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT andreameurer kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT felixstief kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT felixstief kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
_version_ 1724535969936310272