Is minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis superior to open plating for fixation of two-part fracture of the proximal humerus?
Purpose: Displaced two-part fractures of the proximal humerus are generally treated with open plate (OP) fixation. Recently, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been increasingly favored for fracture healing and functional recovery. We aimed to compare OP and MIPO for two-part fractur...
Main Authors: | Young-Gun Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon Park, Joon-Woo Kim, Jong-Keon Oh, Jong-Pil Yoon, Hee-June Kim, Chang-Wug Oh |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019836156 |
Similar Items
-
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with PHILOS plate for proximal humerus fractures
by: Uğur Gönç, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Outcomes evaluation of locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced fractures of the proximal humerus
by: Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitell, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Narrow locking compression plate vs long philos plate for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of spiral humerus shaft fractures
by: Jae-Jung Jeong, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Locking internal fixator with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the proximal and distal tibial fractures
by: TONG Da-ke, et al.
Published: (2012-02-01) -
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Study Describing Principles and Advantages of the Technique
by: Riccardo Luigi Alberio, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)