An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching

Introduction: It has been a decade since the course “Community Oral Health” has been revised. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the course of community oral health is being taught in the undergraduate program of dental schools in Iran after a decade of revisions.Materials & Methods: In s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hadi Ghasemi, Abdolhamid Zafarmand, MohammadReza Nakhostin
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Mashhad Dental School
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mums.ac.ir/shares/dental_journal/dental%20journal/92/spring/7.Ghasemi%20943.pdf
id doaj-9efbcb46bc4745a08b616cecd64e3aaa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9efbcb46bc4745a08b616cecd64e3aaa2020-11-24T23:23:14ZfasMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Mashhad Dental School1560-92862008-23472013-01-013715564An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching Hadi GhasemiAbdolhamid ZafarmandMohammadReza NakhostinIntroduction: It has been a decade since the course “Community Oral Health” has been revised. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the course of community oral health is being taught in the undergraduate program of dental schools in Iran after a decade of revisions.Materials & Methods: In spring 2010, dental schools have been requested to report how the course of community oral health is being taught in terms of content and format, number of credits and the distribution of the credits along the curriculum, and the discipline of the teachers that teach this course.Results: In total, 12 schools responded. The content of the course, in all the schools, was according to what had been formally authorized by the Ministry of health and the format of presentation was a mix of lecture, workshop, and field work. The most prevalent format of presentation even in some parts of practical credit was lecture; field work was rare. In 92% of the schools, this course consisted of one theoretical and five practical credits. More than half of the schools (58%) reported that the teachers of this course did not have a degree related to the community oral health.Conclusion: There are shortcomings in the mode of teaching the course of community oral health in dental schools in Iran. To improve the quality of teaching for this course, the department of community oral health needs to be strengthened and cooperation with this department must be enhanced inside the dental schools and as well between dental schools and university.http://www.mums.ac.ir/shares/dental_journal/dental%20journal/92/spring/7.Ghasemi%20943.pdfCommunity oral healthdental educationIran.
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hadi Ghasemi
Abdolhamid Zafarmand
MohammadReza Nakhostin
spellingShingle Hadi Ghasemi
Abdolhamid Zafarmand
MohammadReza Nakhostin
An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching
Journal of Mashhad Dental School
Community oral health
dental education
Iran.
author_facet Hadi Ghasemi
Abdolhamid Zafarmand
MohammadReza Nakhostin
author_sort Hadi Ghasemi
title An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching
title_short An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching
title_full An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching
title_sort evaluation of the quality of teaching
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Mashhad Dental School
issn 1560-9286
2008-2347
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Introduction: It has been a decade since the course “Community Oral Health” has been revised. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the course of community oral health is being taught in the undergraduate program of dental schools in Iran after a decade of revisions.Materials & Methods: In spring 2010, dental schools have been requested to report how the course of community oral health is being taught in terms of content and format, number of credits and the distribution of the credits along the curriculum, and the discipline of the teachers that teach this course.Results: In total, 12 schools responded. The content of the course, in all the schools, was according to what had been formally authorized by the Ministry of health and the format of presentation was a mix of lecture, workshop, and field work. The most prevalent format of presentation even in some parts of practical credit was lecture; field work was rare. In 92% of the schools, this course consisted of one theoretical and five practical credits. More than half of the schools (58%) reported that the teachers of this course did not have a degree related to the community oral health.Conclusion: There are shortcomings in the mode of teaching the course of community oral health in dental schools in Iran. To improve the quality of teaching for this course, the department of community oral health needs to be strengthened and cooperation with this department must be enhanced inside the dental schools and as well between dental schools and university.
topic Community oral health
dental education
Iran.
url http://www.mums.ac.ir/shares/dental_journal/dental%20journal/92/spring/7.Ghasemi%20943.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hadighasemi anevaluationofthequalityofteaching
AT abdolhamidzafarmand anevaluationofthequalityofteaching
AT mohammadrezanakhostin anevaluationofthequalityofteaching
AT hadighasemi evaluationofthequalityofteaching
AT abdolhamidzafarmand evaluationofthequalityofteaching
AT mohammadrezanakhostin evaluationofthequalityofteaching
_version_ 1725564563814875136