How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis

Why is it so easy to ignore the ecological and economic crises of the Anthropocene? This article unveils some of the religious biases whose covert operation facilitates the repression or rejection of warnings about the consequences of extreme climate change and excessive capitalist consumption. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: F. LeRon Shults
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-06-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/2/724
id doaj-9f033415e6c94cc2a40a3d8a7c1f20b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f033415e6c94cc2a40a3d8a7c1f20b02020-11-24T21:55:12ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442015-06-016272474110.3390/rel6020724rel6020724How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensisF. LeRon Shults0Institute of Religion, Philosophy and History, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, NorwayWhy is it so easy to ignore the ecological and economic crises of the Anthropocene? This article unveils some of the religious biases whose covert operation facilitates the repression or rejection of warnings about the consequences of extreme climate change and excessive capitalist consumption. The evolved defaults that are most relevant for our purposes here have to do with mental credulity toward religious content (beliefs about supernatural agents) and with social congruity in religious contexts (behaviors shaped by supernatural rituals). Learning how to contest these phylogenetically inherited and culturally fortified biases may be a necessary condition for adapting to and altering our current natural and social environments in ways that will enhance the chances for the survival (and flourishing) of Homo sapiens and other sentient species. I outline a conceptual framework, derived from empirical findings and theoretical developments in the bio-cultural sciences of religion, which can help clarify why and how gods are imaginatively conceived and nurtured by ritually engaged believers. Finally, I discuss the role that “adaptive atheism” might play in responding to the crises of the Anthropocene.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/2/724evolutionbio-cultural study of religioncognitive scienceatheismAnthropocenebiasclimate change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. LeRon Shults
spellingShingle F. LeRon Shults
How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis
Religions
evolution
bio-cultural study of religion
cognitive science
atheism
Anthropocene
bias
climate change
author_facet F. LeRon Shults
author_sort F. LeRon Shults
title How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis
title_short How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis
title_full How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis
title_fullStr How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis
title_full_unstemmed How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo deiparensis
title_sort how to survive the anthropocene: adaptive atheism and the evolution of homo deiparensis
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Why is it so easy to ignore the ecological and economic crises of the Anthropocene? This article unveils some of the religious biases whose covert operation facilitates the repression or rejection of warnings about the consequences of extreme climate change and excessive capitalist consumption. The evolved defaults that are most relevant for our purposes here have to do with mental credulity toward religious content (beliefs about supernatural agents) and with social congruity in religious contexts (behaviors shaped by supernatural rituals). Learning how to contest these phylogenetically inherited and culturally fortified biases may be a necessary condition for adapting to and altering our current natural and social environments in ways that will enhance the chances for the survival (and flourishing) of Homo sapiens and other sentient species. I outline a conceptual framework, derived from empirical findings and theoretical developments in the bio-cultural sciences of religion, which can help clarify why and how gods are imaginatively conceived and nurtured by ritually engaged believers. Finally, I discuss the role that “adaptive atheism” might play in responding to the crises of the Anthropocene.
topic evolution
bio-cultural study of religion
cognitive science
atheism
Anthropocene
bias
climate change
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/2/724
work_keys_str_mv AT fleronshults howtosurvivetheanthropoceneadaptiveatheismandtheevolutionofhomodeiparensis
_version_ 1725864122917060608