Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California

<p class="p1">doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss4art1">http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss4art1</a></p><p class="p1">In branching channel networks, such as in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, junction f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karla T. Gleichauf, Phillip J. Wolfram, Nancy E. Monsen, Oliver B. Fringer, Stephen G. Monismith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2014-12-01
Series:San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6js9z7bc
id doaj-9f0997f476f14b699c338a356fadfbbe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f0997f476f14b699c338a356fadfbbe2020-11-24T22:33:51ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaSan Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science1546-23662014-12-01124ark:13030/qt6js9z7bcDispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, CaliforniaKarla T. Gleichauf0Phillip J. Wolfram1Nancy E. Monsen2Oliver B. Fringer3Stephen G. Monismith4Stanford UniversityEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford University and Climate, Ocean and Sea Ice Modeling (COSIM), Theoretical Division (T-3), Los Alamos National LaboratoryEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford UniversityEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford UniversityEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Stanford University<p class="p1">doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss4art1">http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss4art1</a></p><p class="p1">In branching channel networks, such as in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, junction flow dynamics contribute to dispersion of ecologically important entities such as fish, pollutants, nutrients, salt, sediment, and phytoplankton. Flow transport through a junction largely arises from velocity phasing in the form of divergent flow between junction channels for a portion of the tidal cycle. Field observations in the Georgiana Slough junction, which is composed of the North and South Mokelumne rivers, Georgiana Slough, and the Mokelumne River, show that flow phasing differences between these rivers arise from operational, riverine, and tidal forcing. A combination of Acoustic Doppler Current Profile (ADCP) boat transecting and moored ADCPs over a spring–neap tidal cycle (May to  June 2012) monitored the variability of spatial and temporal velocity, respectively. Two complementary drifter studies enabled assessment of local transport through the junction to identify small-scale intrajunction dynamics. We supplemented field results with numerical simulations using the SUNTANS model to demonstrate the importance of phasing offsets for junction transport and dispersion. Different phasing of inflows to the junction resulted in scalar patchiness that is characteristic of MacVean and Stacey’s (2011) advective tidal trapping. Furthermore, we observed small-scale junction flow features including a recirculation zone and shear layer, which play an important role in intra-junction mixing over time scales shorter than the tidal cycle (i.e., super-tidal time scales). The study period spanned open- and closed-gate operations at the Delta Cross Channel. Synthesis of field observations and modeling efforts suggest that management operations related to the Delta Cross Channel can strongly affect transport in the Delta by modifying the relative contributions of tidal and riverine flows, thereby changing the junction flow phasing.</p><p> </p>http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6js9z7bcJunction dispersion, flow phasing, tidal trapping, super-tidal time scales, Delta Cross Channel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karla T. Gleichauf
Phillip J. Wolfram
Nancy E. Monsen
Oliver B. Fringer
Stephen G. Monismith
spellingShingle Karla T. Gleichauf
Phillip J. Wolfram
Nancy E. Monsen
Oliver B. Fringer
Stephen G. Monismith
Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
Junction dispersion, flow phasing, tidal trapping, super-tidal time scales, Delta Cross Channel
author_facet Karla T. Gleichauf
Phillip J. Wolfram
Nancy E. Monsen
Oliver B. Fringer
Stephen G. Monismith
author_sort Karla T. Gleichauf
title Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California
title_short Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California
title_full Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California
title_fullStr Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California
title_full_unstemmed Dispersion Mechanisms of a Tidal River Junction in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California
title_sort dispersion mechanisms of a tidal river junction in the sacramento–san joaquin delta, california
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
issn 1546-2366
publishDate 2014-12-01
description <p class="p1">doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss4art1">http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss4art1</a></p><p class="p1">In branching channel networks, such as in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, junction flow dynamics contribute to dispersion of ecologically important entities such as fish, pollutants, nutrients, salt, sediment, and phytoplankton. Flow transport through a junction largely arises from velocity phasing in the form of divergent flow between junction channels for a portion of the tidal cycle. Field observations in the Georgiana Slough junction, which is composed of the North and South Mokelumne rivers, Georgiana Slough, and the Mokelumne River, show that flow phasing differences between these rivers arise from operational, riverine, and tidal forcing. A combination of Acoustic Doppler Current Profile (ADCP) boat transecting and moored ADCPs over a spring–neap tidal cycle (May to  June 2012) monitored the variability of spatial and temporal velocity, respectively. Two complementary drifter studies enabled assessment of local transport through the junction to identify small-scale intrajunction dynamics. We supplemented field results with numerical simulations using the SUNTANS model to demonstrate the importance of phasing offsets for junction transport and dispersion. Different phasing of inflows to the junction resulted in scalar patchiness that is characteristic of MacVean and Stacey’s (2011) advective tidal trapping. Furthermore, we observed small-scale junction flow features including a recirculation zone and shear layer, which play an important role in intra-junction mixing over time scales shorter than the tidal cycle (i.e., super-tidal time scales). The study period spanned open- and closed-gate operations at the Delta Cross Channel. Synthesis of field observations and modeling efforts suggest that management operations related to the Delta Cross Channel can strongly affect transport in the Delta by modifying the relative contributions of tidal and riverine flows, thereby changing the junction flow phasing.</p><p> </p>
topic Junction dispersion, flow phasing, tidal trapping, super-tidal time scales, Delta Cross Channel
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6js9z7bc
work_keys_str_mv AT karlatgleichauf dispersionmechanismsofatidalriverjunctioninthesacramentosanjoaquindeltacalifornia
AT phillipjwolfram dispersionmechanismsofatidalriverjunctioninthesacramentosanjoaquindeltacalifornia
AT nancyemonsen dispersionmechanismsofatidalriverjunctioninthesacramentosanjoaquindeltacalifornia
AT oliverbfringer dispersionmechanismsofatidalriverjunctioninthesacramentosanjoaquindeltacalifornia
AT stephengmonismith dispersionmechanismsofatidalriverjunctioninthesacramentosanjoaquindeltacalifornia
_version_ 1725729052677898240