Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation

In a previous study, a daily evaporative fraction (EF) parameterization scheme was derived based on day–night differences in surface temperature, air temperature, and net radiation. Considering the advantage that incoming solar radiation can be readily retrieved from remotely sensed data in comparis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Lu, Ronglin Tang, Huajun Tang, Zhao-Liang Li, Guoqing Zhou, Kun Shao, Yuyun Bi, Jelila Labed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-05-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/5/4369
id doaj-9f20d04627b64b8097277e2422018be1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f20d04627b64b8097277e2422018be12020-11-24T23:52:51ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922014-05-01654369439010.3390/rs6054369rs6054369Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and ValidationJing Lu0Ronglin Tang1Huajun Tang2Zhao-Liang Li3Guoqing Zhou4Kun Shao5Yuyun Bi6Jelila Labed7State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, ChinaGuangxi Key Laboratory of Saptial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guangxi 541004, ChinaSchool of Computer and Information, HeFei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, ChinaICube, UdS, CNRS, 300 Bld Sebastien Brant, CS10413, Illkirch F-67412, FranceIn a previous study, a daily evaporative fraction (EF) parameterization scheme was derived based on day–night differences in surface temperature, air temperature, and net radiation. Considering the advantage that incoming solar radiation can be readily retrieved from remotely sensed data in comparison with surface net radiation, this study simplified the daily EF parameterization scheme using incoming solar radiation as an input. Daily EF estimates from the simplified scheme were nearly equivalent to the results from the original scheme. In situ measurements from six Ameriflux sites with different land covers were used to validate the new simplified EF parameterization scheme. Results showed that daily EF estimates for clear skies were consistent with the in situ EF corrected by the residual energy method, showing a coefficient of determination of 0.586 and a root mean square error of 0.152. Similar results were also obtained for partly clear sky conditions. The non-closure of the measured energy and heat fluxes and the uncertainty in determining fractional vegetation cover were likely to cause discrepancies in estimated daily EF and measured counterparts. The daily EF estimates of different land covers indicate that the constant coefficients in the simplified EF parameterization scheme are not strongly site-specific.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/5/4369evaporative fractionday–night differencesvalidationAmeriflux sites
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing Lu
Ronglin Tang
Huajun Tang
Zhao-Liang Li
Guoqing Zhou
Kun Shao
Yuyun Bi
Jelila Labed
spellingShingle Jing Lu
Ronglin Tang
Huajun Tang
Zhao-Liang Li
Guoqing Zhou
Kun Shao
Yuyun Bi
Jelila Labed
Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation
Remote Sensing
evaporative fraction
day–night differences
validation
Ameriflux sites
author_facet Jing Lu
Ronglin Tang
Huajun Tang
Zhao-Liang Li
Guoqing Zhou
Kun Shao
Yuyun Bi
Jelila Labed
author_sort Jing Lu
title Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation
title_short Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation
title_full Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation
title_fullStr Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation
title_full_unstemmed Daily Evaporative Fraction Parameterization Scheme Driven by Day–Night Differences in Surface Parameters: Improvement and Validation
title_sort daily evaporative fraction parameterization scheme driven by day–night differences in surface parameters: improvement and validation
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2014-05-01
description In a previous study, a daily evaporative fraction (EF) parameterization scheme was derived based on day–night differences in surface temperature, air temperature, and net radiation. Considering the advantage that incoming solar radiation can be readily retrieved from remotely sensed data in comparison with surface net radiation, this study simplified the daily EF parameterization scheme using incoming solar radiation as an input. Daily EF estimates from the simplified scheme were nearly equivalent to the results from the original scheme. In situ measurements from six Ameriflux sites with different land covers were used to validate the new simplified EF parameterization scheme. Results showed that daily EF estimates for clear skies were consistent with the in situ EF corrected by the residual energy method, showing a coefficient of determination of 0.586 and a root mean square error of 0.152. Similar results were also obtained for partly clear sky conditions. The non-closure of the measured energy and heat fluxes and the uncertainty in determining fractional vegetation cover were likely to cause discrepancies in estimated daily EF and measured counterparts. The daily EF estimates of different land covers indicate that the constant coefficients in the simplified EF parameterization scheme are not strongly site-specific.
topic evaporative fraction
day–night differences
validation
Ameriflux sites
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/5/4369
work_keys_str_mv AT jinglu dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT ronglintang dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT huajuntang dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT zhaoliangli dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT guoqingzhou dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT kunshao dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT yuyunbi dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
AT jelilalabed dailyevaporativefractionparameterizationschemedrivenbydaynightdifferencesinsurfaceparametersimprovementandvalidation
_version_ 1725471663168946176