Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer

Background: Ultrasonography and mammography are two radiologic approaches for screening breast cancer; however, the pathology report is required for the ultimate diagnosis of malignancy. This study aimed to assess the concordance of ultrasonography (US) and mammography with the pathology in breast...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leila Ghafoor, Abbas Hajian, Yaser Hamidian, Seyed Hamed Rohani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kaviani Breast Disease Institute 2020-08-01
Series:Archives of Breast Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/301
id doaj-9f611f4f743542f598667c72b942de72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f611f4f743542f598667c72b942de722020-11-25T02:33:02ZengKaviani Breast Disease InstituteArchives of Breast Cancer2383-04332020-08-0110.32768/abc.202073127-131Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast CancerLeila Ghafoor0Abbas Hajian1Yaser Hamidian2Seyed Hamed Rohani3Department of General Surgery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IranDepartment of General Surgery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IranDepartment of Radiology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IranDepartment of General Surgery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran Background: Ultrasonography and mammography are two radiologic approaches for screening breast cancer; however, the pathology report is required for the ultimate diagnosis of malignancy. This study aimed to assess the concordance of ultrasonography (US) and mammography with the pathology in breast cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the breast US and the mammography findings based on the BI-RADS model in comparison with the definitive pathology reports in a single medical center. The sensitivity, the specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and also the concordance between the US and the mammography data were analyzed. Results: In this study, 126 patients were included. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US were 69.8, 71.9, 75.6 and 81.3 and for mammography were 91.9, 76.6, 80.8 and, 94.6 percent, respectively. The ROC-curve for either the US or the mammography showed that the BI-RADS 4 was accompanied with the highest sensitivity and specificity for the screening of the malignant breast lesions regarding the final diagnosis. Although an overall higher correlation between mammography report and presence of a malignant lesion was observed, the total relative concordance between the results of US and mammography as screening tools proved to be statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: Both the US and the mammography were sensitive and specific screening tools, particularly for the malignant breast lesions. Furthermore, when evidence of the BI-RADS?4 in either the mammography or the US was present, utilization of the other test could be ignored before biopsy. http://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/301UltrasonographyMammographyBreast cancer BI-RADS Screening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leila Ghafoor
Abbas Hajian
Yaser Hamidian
Seyed Hamed Rohani
spellingShingle Leila Ghafoor
Abbas Hajian
Yaser Hamidian
Seyed Hamed Rohani
Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer
Archives of Breast Cancer
Ultrasonography
Mammography
Breast cancer
BI-RADS
Screening
author_facet Leila Ghafoor
Abbas Hajian
Yaser Hamidian
Seyed Hamed Rohani
author_sort Leila Ghafoor
title Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer
title_short Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer
title_full Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Mammography Findings with Pathology Results in Breast Cancer
title_sort concordance and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography findings with pathology results in breast cancer
publisher Kaviani Breast Disease Institute
series Archives of Breast Cancer
issn 2383-0433
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background: Ultrasonography and mammography are two radiologic approaches for screening breast cancer; however, the pathology report is required for the ultimate diagnosis of malignancy. This study aimed to assess the concordance of ultrasonography (US) and mammography with the pathology in breast cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the breast US and the mammography findings based on the BI-RADS model in comparison with the definitive pathology reports in a single medical center. The sensitivity, the specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and also the concordance between the US and the mammography data were analyzed. Results: In this study, 126 patients were included. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US were 69.8, 71.9, 75.6 and 81.3 and for mammography were 91.9, 76.6, 80.8 and, 94.6 percent, respectively. The ROC-curve for either the US or the mammography showed that the BI-RADS 4 was accompanied with the highest sensitivity and specificity for the screening of the malignant breast lesions regarding the final diagnosis. Although an overall higher correlation between mammography report and presence of a malignant lesion was observed, the total relative concordance between the results of US and mammography as screening tools proved to be statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: Both the US and the mammography were sensitive and specific screening tools, particularly for the malignant breast lesions. Furthermore, when evidence of the BI-RADS?4 in either the mammography or the US was present, utilization of the other test could be ignored before biopsy.
topic Ultrasonography
Mammography
Breast cancer
BI-RADS
Screening
url http://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/301
work_keys_str_mv AT leilaghafoor concordanceanddiagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyandmammographyfindingswithpathologyresultsinbreastcancer
AT abbashajian concordanceanddiagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyandmammographyfindingswithpathologyresultsinbreastcancer
AT yaserhamidian concordanceanddiagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyandmammographyfindingswithpathologyresultsinbreastcancer
AT seyedhamedrohani concordanceanddiagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyandmammographyfindingswithpathologyresultsinbreastcancer
_version_ 1724815985561567232