Postmodernism and the end of anthropology

The notion of postmodernism concerns changes in culture, social and economic relationships and ways of thinking related to post-industrial society and information epoch. The main feature of the changes in the sphere of thinking concerns supremacy of signs over reality, that is, over objects which th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sekulić Nada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia 2002-01-01
Series:Sociologija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2002/0038-03180204343S.pdf
id doaj-9f6a99cbdd6f41e99112744bb196ff78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f6a99cbdd6f41e99112744bb196ff782020-11-25T02:36:30ZengSociological Scientific Society of SerbiaSociologija0038-03182002-01-0144434336610.2298/SOC0204343SPostmodernism and the end of anthropologySekulić NadaThe notion of postmodernism concerns changes in culture, social and economic relationships and ways of thinking related to post-industrial society and information epoch. The main feature of the changes in the sphere of thinking concerns supremacy of signs over reality, that is, over objects which thinking refers to as a field of true experience. Autonomy of signs (symbolic communities, social and cultural practices aimed at construction of reality, domination of technology and engineering in all sectors of life, cult of desire in regard to consumer culture) makes necessary rethinking over basic categories (man, evolution, progress, nature, culture, tradition, sex), with the purpose to criticize their metaphysical discursive background and to point to political aspects of such thinking. The standpoint from which the critique of anthropocentrism opens new and more human horizons in social thought today is questioned in the article. The author argues that 'anthropocentrism', as ethical and responsible attitude, based on connection between praxis, phronesis and doxa, is actually prerequisite to deconstruction of power discourse today. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2002/0038-03180204343S.pdfpostmodernismparadigmatic changesconsumer culture and politicscritique of representationlegitimation crisisconceptual/linguistic turn in human sciencescritique of anthropocentrism as discursive field of metaphysicsdoxaphronesi
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sekulić Nada
spellingShingle Sekulić Nada
Postmodernism and the end of anthropology
Sociologija
postmodernism
paradigmatic changes
consumer culture and politics
critique of representation
legitimation crisis
conceptual/linguistic turn in human sciences
critique of anthropocentrism as discursive field of metaphysics
doxa
phronesi
author_facet Sekulić Nada
author_sort Sekulić Nada
title Postmodernism and the end of anthropology
title_short Postmodernism and the end of anthropology
title_full Postmodernism and the end of anthropology
title_fullStr Postmodernism and the end of anthropology
title_full_unstemmed Postmodernism and the end of anthropology
title_sort postmodernism and the end of anthropology
publisher Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia
series Sociologija
issn 0038-0318
publishDate 2002-01-01
description The notion of postmodernism concerns changes in culture, social and economic relationships and ways of thinking related to post-industrial society and information epoch. The main feature of the changes in the sphere of thinking concerns supremacy of signs over reality, that is, over objects which thinking refers to as a field of true experience. Autonomy of signs (symbolic communities, social and cultural practices aimed at construction of reality, domination of technology and engineering in all sectors of life, cult of desire in regard to consumer culture) makes necessary rethinking over basic categories (man, evolution, progress, nature, culture, tradition, sex), with the purpose to criticize their metaphysical discursive background and to point to political aspects of such thinking. The standpoint from which the critique of anthropocentrism opens new and more human horizons in social thought today is questioned in the article. The author argues that 'anthropocentrism', as ethical and responsible attitude, based on connection between praxis, phronesis and doxa, is actually prerequisite to deconstruction of power discourse today.
topic postmodernism
paradigmatic changes
consumer culture and politics
critique of representation
legitimation crisis
conceptual/linguistic turn in human sciences
critique of anthropocentrism as discursive field of metaphysics
doxa
phronesi
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2002/0038-03180204343S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sekulicnada postmodernismandtheendofanthropology
_version_ 1724799745153564672