Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria

Objectives To evaluate the serrated lesion detection rate in colonoscopy at a specialized clinic and its role as quality criteria for endoscopic examination. Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study with all patients that underwent colonoscopy between October 2018 and May 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conceição de Maria Aquino Vieira Clairet, José Luis Braga De Aquino, Laurent Martial Clairet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Coloproctology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730261
id doaj-9f910d2263e5454688c65bd6023b0239
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f910d2263e5454688c65bd6023b02392021-09-20T22:53:00ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Journal of Coloproctology2237-93632317-64232021-09-01410322823310.1055/s-0041-1730261Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality CriteriaConceição de Maria Aquino Vieira Clairet0José Luis Braga De Aquino1Laurent Martial Clairet2Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, BrazilPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, BrazilCentro Universitário UNIFACID, Teresina, PI, BrazilObjectives To evaluate the serrated lesion detection rate in colonoscopy at a specialized clinic and its role as quality criteria for endoscopic examination. Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study with all patients that underwent colonoscopy between October 2018 and May 2019, performed by an experimented physician. A questionnaire was answered before the examination by the patient, and another questionnaire after the colonoscopy was answered by the medical team. All polyps identified were removed and sent to the same pathologist for analysis. Results A total of 1,000 colonoscopies were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 58.9 years old, and most of them were female (60.6%). In 62.5% of the procedures, polyps were removed, obtaining a total of 1,730 polyps, of which 529 were serrated lesions, being 272 sessile serrated lesions (SSL). This data resulted in a serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) of 29.2%, and of 14% when considering only the SSL detection rate (SSLDR). The right colon had higher rates, with 22.3% SDR and 15.3% SSLDR. Screening colonoscopies also presented a higher serrated detection rate, of 20%, followed by diagnostics and follow-up exams. Smoking was the only risk factor associated with higher serrated detection rate. Conclusions The serrated lesion detection rate is higher than the ones already previously suggested and the have the higher rates were stablished in the right colon and on screening exams.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730261colonoscopycolorectal cancerpolyps
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Conceição de Maria Aquino Vieira Clairet
José Luis Braga De Aquino
Laurent Martial Clairet
spellingShingle Conceição de Maria Aquino Vieira Clairet
José Luis Braga De Aquino
Laurent Martial Clairet
Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
Journal of Coloproctology
colonoscopy
colorectal cancer
polyps
author_facet Conceição de Maria Aquino Vieira Clairet
José Luis Braga De Aquino
Laurent Martial Clairet
author_sort Conceição de Maria Aquino Vieira Clairet
title Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
title_short Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
title_full Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Serrated Lesions Detection Rate and Its Role as a Colonoscopy Quality Criteria
title_sort evaluation of the serrated lesions detection rate and its role as a colonoscopy quality criteria
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
series Journal of Coloproctology
issn 2237-9363
2317-6423
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objectives To evaluate the serrated lesion detection rate in colonoscopy at a specialized clinic and its role as quality criteria for endoscopic examination. Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study with all patients that underwent colonoscopy between October 2018 and May 2019, performed by an experimented physician. A questionnaire was answered before the examination by the patient, and another questionnaire after the colonoscopy was answered by the medical team. All polyps identified were removed and sent to the same pathologist for analysis. Results A total of 1,000 colonoscopies were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 58.9 years old, and most of them were female (60.6%). In 62.5% of the procedures, polyps were removed, obtaining a total of 1,730 polyps, of which 529 were serrated lesions, being 272 sessile serrated lesions (SSL). This data resulted in a serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) of 29.2%, and of 14% when considering only the SSL detection rate (SSLDR). The right colon had higher rates, with 22.3% SDR and 15.3% SSLDR. Screening colonoscopies also presented a higher serrated detection rate, of 20%, followed by diagnostics and follow-up exams. Smoking was the only risk factor associated with higher serrated detection rate. Conclusions The serrated lesion detection rate is higher than the ones already previously suggested and the have the higher rates were stablished in the right colon and on screening exams.
topic colonoscopy
colorectal cancer
polyps
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1730261
work_keys_str_mv AT conceicaodemariaaquinovieiraclairet evaluationoftheserratedlesionsdetectionrateanditsroleasacolonoscopyqualitycriteria
AT joseluisbragadeaquino evaluationoftheserratedlesionsdetectionrateanditsroleasacolonoscopyqualitycriteria
AT laurentmartialclairet evaluationoftheserratedlesionsdetectionrateanditsroleasacolonoscopyqualitycriteria
_version_ 1717373915040317440