Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
Objective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Result...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.703286/full |
id |
doaj-9fa413c396f948bb9f3e2c47c7fb9b17 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9fa413c396f948bb9f3e2c47c7fb9b172021-09-21T06:42:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-09-011210.3389/fneur.2021.703286703286Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter PlacementWei Ma0Zhengde Zhao1Qining Fu2Liangzhu Hu3Xia Zhao4Chao Wang5Yangdong Liu6Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaObjective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Results: Twenty-nine patients with previous jugular catheter placement history (CVC group) and 33 patients (excluded two with technical failure) without such history (non-CVC group) are included in this study. Previous jugular catheter placement history raised the risk of postintervention recurrence 1.02 times (CVC group vs. non-CVC group, HR = 2.02 95%CI: 0.91–4.48). The primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 76.9, 54.2, 45.5, and 25.0% separately in the CVC group and 80.6, 70.0, 67.9, and 44.4% separately in the non-CVC group. The assisted primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 92.3, 91.7, 86.4, and 68.8% separately in the CVC group and 93.5, 90.0, 82.1, and 61.1% separately in the non-CVC group. Patients in the CVC group received a higher frequency of reintervention (0.7 times/year/patient vs. 0.3 times/year/patient). There was no significant difference in the assisted primary patency rate between the two groups. Different primary interventions (angioplasty alone, bare metal stent, stent graft) did not affect primary patency and assisted primary patency, but percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS) with a bare metal stent had a significant lower primary patency rate between 3 and 24 months compared with PTS with a stent graft (p = 0.011).Conclusion: Central venous stenosis/occlusion with a previous jugular catheter placement history develops symptoms earlier and had a worse prognosis after endovascular intervention. More efforts are needed to carry out end-stage kidney disease life plan to reduce the harm of evitable catheter placement.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.703286/fullcentral venous stenosishemodialysiscentral venous catheterpercutaneous endovascular interventionpatency |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wei Ma Zhengde Zhao Qining Fu Liangzhu Hu Xia Zhao Chao Wang Yangdong Liu |
spellingShingle |
Wei Ma Zhengde Zhao Qining Fu Liangzhu Hu Xia Zhao Chao Wang Yangdong Liu Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement Frontiers in Neurology central venous stenosis hemodialysis central venous catheter percutaneous endovascular intervention patency |
author_facet |
Wei Ma Zhengde Zhao Qining Fu Liangzhu Hu Xia Zhao Chao Wang Yangdong Liu |
author_sort |
Wei Ma |
title |
Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement |
title_short |
Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement |
title_full |
Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement |
title_sort |
comparison of management for central venous stenosis with or without previous catheter placement |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neurology |
issn |
1664-2295 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Objective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Results: Twenty-nine patients with previous jugular catheter placement history (CVC group) and 33 patients (excluded two with technical failure) without such history (non-CVC group) are included in this study. Previous jugular catheter placement history raised the risk of postintervention recurrence 1.02 times (CVC group vs. non-CVC group, HR = 2.02 95%CI: 0.91–4.48). The primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 76.9, 54.2, 45.5, and 25.0% separately in the CVC group and 80.6, 70.0, 67.9, and 44.4% separately in the non-CVC group. The assisted primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 92.3, 91.7, 86.4, and 68.8% separately in the CVC group and 93.5, 90.0, 82.1, and 61.1% separately in the non-CVC group. Patients in the CVC group received a higher frequency of reintervention (0.7 times/year/patient vs. 0.3 times/year/patient). There was no significant difference in the assisted primary patency rate between the two groups. Different primary interventions (angioplasty alone, bare metal stent, stent graft) did not affect primary patency and assisted primary patency, but percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS) with a bare metal stent had a significant lower primary patency rate between 3 and 24 months compared with PTS with a stent graft (p = 0.011).Conclusion: Central venous stenosis/occlusion with a previous jugular catheter placement history develops symptoms earlier and had a worse prognosis after endovascular intervention. More efforts are needed to carry out end-stage kidney disease life plan to reduce the harm of evitable catheter placement. |
topic |
central venous stenosis hemodialysis central venous catheter percutaneous endovascular intervention patency |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.703286/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weima comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement AT zhengdezhao comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement AT qiningfu comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement AT liangzhuhu comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement AT xiazhao comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement AT chaowang comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement AT yangdongliu comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement |
_version_ |
1717373734736625664 |