Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement

Objective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Result...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Ma, Zhengde Zhao, Qining Fu, Liangzhu Hu, Xia Zhao, Chao Wang, Yangdong Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.703286/full
id doaj-9fa413c396f948bb9f3e2c47c7fb9b17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fa413c396f948bb9f3e2c47c7fb9b172021-09-21T06:42:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-09-011210.3389/fneur.2021.703286703286Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter PlacementWei Ma0Zhengde Zhao1Qining Fu2Liangzhu Hu3Xia Zhao4Chao Wang5Yangdong Liu6Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaObjective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Results: Twenty-nine patients with previous jugular catheter placement history (CVC group) and 33 patients (excluded two with technical failure) without such history (non-CVC group) are included in this study. Previous jugular catheter placement history raised the risk of postintervention recurrence 1.02 times (CVC group vs. non-CVC group, HR = 2.02 95%CI: 0.91–4.48). The primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 76.9, 54.2, 45.5, and 25.0% separately in the CVC group and 80.6, 70.0, 67.9, and 44.4% separately in the non-CVC group. The assisted primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 92.3, 91.7, 86.4, and 68.8% separately in the CVC group and 93.5, 90.0, 82.1, and 61.1% separately in the non-CVC group. Patients in the CVC group received a higher frequency of reintervention (0.7 times/year/patient vs. 0.3 times/year/patient). There was no significant difference in the assisted primary patency rate between the two groups. Different primary interventions (angioplasty alone, bare metal stent, stent graft) did not affect primary patency and assisted primary patency, but percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS) with a bare metal stent had a significant lower primary patency rate between 3 and 24 months compared with PTS with a stent graft (p = 0.011).Conclusion: Central venous stenosis/occlusion with a previous jugular catheter placement history develops symptoms earlier and had a worse prognosis after endovascular intervention. More efforts are needed to carry out end-stage kidney disease life plan to reduce the harm of evitable catheter placement.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.703286/fullcentral venous stenosishemodialysiscentral venous catheterpercutaneous endovascular interventionpatency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei Ma
Zhengde Zhao
Qining Fu
Liangzhu Hu
Xia Zhao
Chao Wang
Yangdong Liu
spellingShingle Wei Ma
Zhengde Zhao
Qining Fu
Liangzhu Hu
Xia Zhao
Chao Wang
Yangdong Liu
Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
Frontiers in Neurology
central venous stenosis
hemodialysis
central venous catheter
percutaneous endovascular intervention
patency
author_facet Wei Ma
Zhengde Zhao
Qining Fu
Liangzhu Hu
Xia Zhao
Chao Wang
Yangdong Liu
author_sort Wei Ma
title Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
title_short Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
title_full Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
title_fullStr Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Management for Central Venous Stenosis With or Without Previous Catheter Placement
title_sort comparison of management for central venous stenosis with or without previous catheter placement
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objective: To compare central venous stenosis/occlusion with or without previous jugular catheter placement history.Methods: Data of patients with central vein stenosis/occlusion receiving endovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed.Results: Twenty-nine patients with previous jugular catheter placement history (CVC group) and 33 patients (excluded two with technical failure) without such history (non-CVC group) are included in this study. Previous jugular catheter placement history raised the risk of postintervention recurrence 1.02 times (CVC group vs. non-CVC group, HR = 2.02 95%CI: 0.91–4.48). The primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 76.9, 54.2, 45.5, and 25.0% separately in the CVC group and 80.6, 70.0, 67.9, and 44.4% separately in the non-CVC group. The assisted primary patency rate at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 92.3, 91.7, 86.4, and 68.8% separately in the CVC group and 93.5, 90.0, 82.1, and 61.1% separately in the non-CVC group. Patients in the CVC group received a higher frequency of reintervention (0.7 times/year/patient vs. 0.3 times/year/patient). There was no significant difference in the assisted primary patency rate between the two groups. Different primary interventions (angioplasty alone, bare metal stent, stent graft) did not affect primary patency and assisted primary patency, but percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS) with a bare metal stent had a significant lower primary patency rate between 3 and 24 months compared with PTS with a stent graft (p = 0.011).Conclusion: Central venous stenosis/occlusion with a previous jugular catheter placement history develops symptoms earlier and had a worse prognosis after endovascular intervention. More efforts are needed to carry out end-stage kidney disease life plan to reduce the harm of evitable catheter placement.
topic central venous stenosis
hemodialysis
central venous catheter
percutaneous endovascular intervention
patency
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.703286/full
work_keys_str_mv AT weima comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
AT zhengdezhao comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
AT qiningfu comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
AT liangzhuhu comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
AT xiazhao comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
AT chaowang comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
AT yangdongliu comparisonofmanagementforcentralvenousstenosiswithorwithoutpreviouscatheterplacement
_version_ 1717373734736625664