Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points

Summary: The diagnostic assessment of liver injury is an important step in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Although liver biopsy is the reference standard for the assessment of necroinflammation and fibrosis, the inherent limitations of an invasive procedure, and need fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keyur Patel, Giada Sebastiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-04-01
Series:JHEP Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258955592030001X
id doaj-9fb394cd72254e0a96be2e14318ffc71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fb394cd72254e0a96be2e14318ffc712020-11-25T02:28:41ZengElsevierJHEP Reports2589-55592020-04-0122Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey pointsKeyur Patel0Giada Sebastiani1Division of Gastroenterology, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Corresponding author. Address: Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, 9EN, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, CanadaSummary: The diagnostic assessment of liver injury is an important step in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Although liver biopsy is the reference standard for the assessment of necroinflammation and fibrosis, the inherent limitations of an invasive procedure, and need for repeat sampling, have led to the development of several non-invasive tests (NITs) as alternatives to liver biopsy. Such non-invasive approaches mostly include biological (serum biomarker algorithms) or physical (imaging assessment of tissue stiffness) assessments. However, currently available NITs have several limitations, such as variability, inadequate accuracy and risk factors for error, while the development of a newer generation of biomarkers for fibrosis may be limited by the sampling error inherent to the reference standard. Many of the current NITs were initially developed to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, subsequently refined for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and further adapted for prognostication in CLD. An important consideration is that despite their increased use in clinical practice, these NITs were not designed to reflect the dynamic process of fibrogenesis, differentiate between adjacent disease stages, diagnose non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or follow longitudinal changes in fibrosis or disease activity caused by natural history or therapeutic intervention. Understanding the strengths and limitations of these NITs will allow for more judicious interpretation in the clinical context, where NITs should be viewed as complementary to, rather than as a replacement for, liver biopsy. Keywords: Liver biopsy, Biomarkers, Elastography, Viral hepatitis, Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseasehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258955592030001X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keyur Patel
Giada Sebastiani
spellingShingle Keyur Patel
Giada Sebastiani
Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points
JHEP Reports
author_facet Keyur Patel
Giada Sebastiani
author_sort Keyur Patel
title Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points
title_short Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points
title_full Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points
title_fullStr Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points
title_full_unstemmed Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosisKey points
title_sort limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosiskey points
publisher Elsevier
series JHEP Reports
issn 2589-5559
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Summary: The diagnostic assessment of liver injury is an important step in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Although liver biopsy is the reference standard for the assessment of necroinflammation and fibrosis, the inherent limitations of an invasive procedure, and need for repeat sampling, have led to the development of several non-invasive tests (NITs) as alternatives to liver biopsy. Such non-invasive approaches mostly include biological (serum biomarker algorithms) or physical (imaging assessment of tissue stiffness) assessments. However, currently available NITs have several limitations, such as variability, inadequate accuracy and risk factors for error, while the development of a newer generation of biomarkers for fibrosis may be limited by the sampling error inherent to the reference standard. Many of the current NITs were initially developed to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, subsequently refined for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and further adapted for prognostication in CLD. An important consideration is that despite their increased use in clinical practice, these NITs were not designed to reflect the dynamic process of fibrogenesis, differentiate between adjacent disease stages, diagnose non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or follow longitudinal changes in fibrosis or disease activity caused by natural history or therapeutic intervention. Understanding the strengths and limitations of these NITs will allow for more judicious interpretation in the clinical context, where NITs should be viewed as complementary to, rather than as a replacement for, liver biopsy. Keywords: Liver biopsy, Biomarkers, Elastography, Viral hepatitis, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258955592030001X
work_keys_str_mv AT keyurpatel limitationsofnoninvasivetestsforassessmentofliverfibrosiskeypoints
AT giadasebastiani limitationsofnoninvasivetestsforassessmentofliverfibrosiskeypoints
_version_ 1724837174713516032