Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.

The idea of "date" and "party" hubs has been influential in the study of protein-protein interaction networks. Date hubs display low co-expression with their partners, whilst party hubs have high co-expression. It was proposed that party hubs are local coordinators whereas date h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumeet Agarwal, Charlotte M Deane, Mason A Porter, Nick S Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-06-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2887459?pdf=render
id doaj-9fc284e1aa2c47c8946d25fb9dd0200f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fc284e1aa2c47c8946d25fb9dd0200f2020-11-25T01:13:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582010-06-0166e100081710.1371/journal.pcbi.1000817Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.Sumeet AgarwalCharlotte M DeaneMason A PorterNick S JonesThe idea of "date" and "party" hubs has been influential in the study of protein-protein interaction networks. Date hubs display low co-expression with their partners, whilst party hubs have high co-expression. It was proposed that party hubs are local coordinators whereas date hubs are global connectors. Here, we show that the reported importance of date hubs to network connectivity can in fact be attributed to a tiny subset of them. Crucially, these few, extremely central, hubs do not display particularly low expression correlation, undermining the idea of a link between this quantity and hub function. The date/party distinction was originally motivated by an approximately bimodal distribution of hub co-expression; we show that this feature is not always robust to methodological changes. Additionally, topological properties of hubs do not in general correlate with co-expression. However, we find significant correlations between interaction centrality and the functional similarity of the interacting proteins. We suggest that thinking in terms of a date/party dichotomy for hubs in protein interaction networks is not meaningful, and it might be more useful to conceive of roles for protein-protein interactions rather than for individual proteins.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2887459?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumeet Agarwal
Charlotte M Deane
Mason A Porter
Nick S Jones
spellingShingle Sumeet Agarwal
Charlotte M Deane
Mason A Porter
Nick S Jones
Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Sumeet Agarwal
Charlotte M Deane
Mason A Porter
Nick S Jones
author_sort Sumeet Agarwal
title Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
title_short Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
title_full Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
title_fullStr Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
title_sort revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2010-06-01
description The idea of "date" and "party" hubs has been influential in the study of protein-protein interaction networks. Date hubs display low co-expression with their partners, whilst party hubs have high co-expression. It was proposed that party hubs are local coordinators whereas date hubs are global connectors. Here, we show that the reported importance of date hubs to network connectivity can in fact be attributed to a tiny subset of them. Crucially, these few, extremely central, hubs do not display particularly low expression correlation, undermining the idea of a link between this quantity and hub function. The date/party distinction was originally motivated by an approximately bimodal distribution of hub co-expression; we show that this feature is not always robust to methodological changes. Additionally, topological properties of hubs do not in general correlate with co-expression. However, we find significant correlations between interaction centrality and the functional similarity of the interacting proteins. We suggest that thinking in terms of a date/party dichotomy for hubs in protein interaction networks is not meaningful, and it might be more useful to conceive of roles for protein-protein interactions rather than for individual proteins.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2887459?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sumeetagarwal revisitingdateandpartyhubsnovelapproachestoroleassignmentinproteininteractionnetworks
AT charlottemdeane revisitingdateandpartyhubsnovelapproachestoroleassignmentinproteininteractionnetworks
AT masonaporter revisitingdateandpartyhubsnovelapproachestoroleassignmentinproteininteractionnetworks
AT nicksjones revisitingdateandpartyhubsnovelapproachestoroleassignmentinproteininteractionnetworks
_version_ 1725161931544723456