Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements

  Background and Aims: In case of nonsurgical endodontic re-treatment or replacing a restoration, one of the best methods for removing post from the canal is using an ultrasonic vibration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of post luted wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dastnaei Peimaneh Hosseini, Dastgurdi Maziar Ebrahimi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Dental Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-768&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-9feb805d413a4b2da02987c36993214b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9feb805d413a4b2da02987c36993214b2020-11-25T00:17:48ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442015-01-01274265271Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cementsDastnaei Peimaneh Hosseini 0Dastgurdi Maziar Ebrahimi 1   Background and Aims: In case of nonsurgical endodontic re-treatment or replacing a restoration, one of the best methods for removing post from the canal is using an ultrasonic vibration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of post luted with zinc phosphate or glass ionmer cements.   Materials and Methods: 96 sound extracted lower premolars were selected. The coronal section of specimen was removed and the roots were endodontically treated. A 9-mm post space was prepared in each specimens and a stainless steel Parapost XP was cemented into the post space. Half of the specimens were cemented with the Zinc phosphate cement and the other by g lass ionomer cement. After 7 days of storage, both groups were equally divided into 4 subgroups of 12 teeth. Control group did not receive any treatment. The other subgroups subjected to ultrasonic vibration for 4, 8 or 12 minutes. The retention of all specimens was evaluated and data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.   Results: In control (no ultrasonic) group and 4 minute ultrasonic group, the retention of posts luted with Zinc phosphate cement were not significantly differen t from those luted with g lass ionomer cement. (P=0.372). On the other hand , applying of ultrasonic vibration for 8 and 12 minutes in zinc phosphate and 12 minutes in g lass ionomer caused a significant reduction in the retention of posts (P=0.01).   Conclusion: Although, the initial retention of two cements was not different, the ultrasonic vibration had more catastrophic effect on zinc phosphate in comparison to glass ionomer. http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-768&slc_lang=en&sid=1Ultrasonics Zinc phosphate cement Glass ionomer cement Retention
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dastnaei Peimaneh Hosseini
Dastgurdi Maziar Ebrahimi
spellingShingle Dastnaei Peimaneh Hosseini
Dastgurdi Maziar Ebrahimi
Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
Journal of Dental Medicine
Ultrasonics
Zinc phosphate cement
Glass ionomer cement
Retention
author_facet Dastnaei Peimaneh Hosseini
Dastgurdi Maziar Ebrahimi
author_sort Dastnaei Peimaneh Hosseini
title Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
title_short Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
title_full Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
title_fullStr Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
title_full_unstemmed Effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
title_sort effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of prefabricated posts luted with two different cements
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Medicine
issn 1024-641X
2008-2444
publishDate 2015-01-01
description   Background and Aims: In case of nonsurgical endodontic re-treatment or replacing a restoration, one of the best methods for removing post from the canal is using an ultrasonic vibration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasonic vibration time on the retention of post luted with zinc phosphate or glass ionmer cements.   Materials and Methods: 96 sound extracted lower premolars were selected. The coronal section of specimen was removed and the roots were endodontically treated. A 9-mm post space was prepared in each specimens and a stainless steel Parapost XP was cemented into the post space. Half of the specimens were cemented with the Zinc phosphate cement and the other by g lass ionomer cement. After 7 days of storage, both groups were equally divided into 4 subgroups of 12 teeth. Control group did not receive any treatment. The other subgroups subjected to ultrasonic vibration for 4, 8 or 12 minutes. The retention of all specimens was evaluated and data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.   Results: In control (no ultrasonic) group and 4 minute ultrasonic group, the retention of posts luted with Zinc phosphate cement were not significantly differen t from those luted with g lass ionomer cement. (P=0.372). On the other hand , applying of ultrasonic vibration for 8 and 12 minutes in zinc phosphate and 12 minutes in g lass ionomer caused a significant reduction in the retention of posts (P=0.01).   Conclusion: Although, the initial retention of two cements was not different, the ultrasonic vibration had more catastrophic effect on zinc phosphate in comparison to glass ionomer.
topic Ultrasonics
Zinc phosphate cement
Glass ionomer cement
Retention
url http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-768&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT dastnaeipeimanehhosseini effectofultrasonicvibrationtimeontheretentionofprefabricatedpostslutedwithtwodifferentcements
AT dastgurdimaziarebrahimi effectofultrasonicvibrationtimeontheretentionofprefabricatedpostslutedwithtwodifferentcements
_version_ 1725378183258177536