Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)

Abstract Background Fatigue has a major influence on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a frequently used patient-reported measure of fatigue impact, but does not generate the health state utility values required to inform cost-effectiveness analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Goodwin, A. Hawton, C. Green
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-019-1205-y
id doaj-9ff4b4543968475893871b45625c2eb1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ff4b4543968475893871b45625c2eb12020-11-25T04:00:11ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252019-08-0117111210.1186/s12955-019-1205-yUsing the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)E. Goodwin0A. Hawton1C. Green2Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterHealth Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterHealth Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterAbstract Background Fatigue has a major influence on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a frequently used patient-reported measure of fatigue impact, but does not generate the health state utility values required to inform cost-effectiveness analysis, limiting its applicability within decision-making contexts. The objective of this study was to use statistical mapping methods to convert Fatigue Severity Scale scores to health state utility values from three preference-based measures: the EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-8D. Methods The relationships between the measures were estimated through regression analysis using cohort data from 1056 people with multiple sclerosis in South West England. Estimation errors were assessed and predictive performance of the best models as tested in a separate sample (n = 352). Results For the EQ-5D and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-8D, the best performing models used a censored least absolute deviation specification, with Fatigue Severity Scale total score, age and gender as predictors. For the SF-6D, the best performing model used an ordinary least squares specification, with Fatigue Severity Scale total score as the only predictor. Conclusions Here we present algorithms to convert Fatigue Severity Scales scores to health state utility values based on three preference-based measures. These values may be used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years for use in cost-effectiveness analyses and to consider the health-related quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis, thereby informing health policy decisions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-019-1205-yCost effectivenessDecision makingMultiple sclerosisOutcomes researchQuality of lifeFatigue
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Goodwin
A. Hawton
C. Green
spellingShingle E. Goodwin
A. Hawton
C. Green
Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Cost effectiveness
Decision making
Multiple sclerosis
Outcomes research
Quality of life
Fatigue
author_facet E. Goodwin
A. Hawton
C. Green
author_sort E. Goodwin
title Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)
title_short Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)
title_full Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)
title_fullStr Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)
title_full_unstemmed Using the Fatigue Severity Scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D, MSIS-8D)
title_sort using the fatigue severity scale to inform healthcare decision-making in multiple sclerosis: mapping to three quality-adjusted life-year measures (eq-5d-3l, sf-6d, msis-8d)
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Background Fatigue has a major influence on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a frequently used patient-reported measure of fatigue impact, but does not generate the health state utility values required to inform cost-effectiveness analysis, limiting its applicability within decision-making contexts. The objective of this study was to use statistical mapping methods to convert Fatigue Severity Scale scores to health state utility values from three preference-based measures: the EQ-5D-3L, SF-6D and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-8D. Methods The relationships between the measures were estimated through regression analysis using cohort data from 1056 people with multiple sclerosis in South West England. Estimation errors were assessed and predictive performance of the best models as tested in a separate sample (n = 352). Results For the EQ-5D and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-8D, the best performing models used a censored least absolute deviation specification, with Fatigue Severity Scale total score, age and gender as predictors. For the SF-6D, the best performing model used an ordinary least squares specification, with Fatigue Severity Scale total score as the only predictor. Conclusions Here we present algorithms to convert Fatigue Severity Scales scores to health state utility values based on three preference-based measures. These values may be used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years for use in cost-effectiveness analyses and to consider the health-related quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis, thereby informing health policy decisions.
topic Cost effectiveness
Decision making
Multiple sclerosis
Outcomes research
Quality of life
Fatigue
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-019-1205-y
work_keys_str_mv AT egoodwin usingthefatigueseverityscaletoinformhealthcaredecisionmakinginmultiplesclerosismappingtothreequalityadjustedlifeyearmeasureseq5d3lsf6dmsis8d
AT ahawton usingthefatigueseverityscaletoinformhealthcaredecisionmakinginmultiplesclerosismappingtothreequalityadjustedlifeyearmeasureseq5d3lsf6dmsis8d
AT cgreen usingthefatigueseverityscaletoinformhealthcaredecisionmakinginmultiplesclerosismappingtothreequalityadjustedlifeyearmeasureseq5d3lsf6dmsis8d
_version_ 1724451971220373504