Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument

Environmental decision-making scholars have attended closely to the role of publics and counterpublics in environmental controversies. However, this body of work has undertheorized the ways that Indigeneity may complicate access to or desirability of American publicity as a driving force in environm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor N. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.673115/full
id doaj-a068aac2d5c7444598f65955c0cd2f23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a068aac2d5c7444598f65955c0cd2f232021-07-28T11:09:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2021-07-01610.3389/fcomm.2021.673115673115Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National MonumentTaylor N. JohnsonEnvironmental decision-making scholars have attended closely to the role of publics and counterpublics in environmental controversies. However, this body of work has undertheorized the ways that Indigeneity may complicate access to or desirability of American publicity as a driving force in environmental advocacy. Inclusion within the American national body both functions as an advocacy tool for Native people and as a colonial discourse that may undermine sovereignty goals. Through a critical rhetorical analysis of documents at the center of the controversy over Bears Ears National Monument, this essay explicates the deployment of American publicity both to support and to undermine Native advocacy for the Monument. Scholars of rhetoric and environmental decision-making must re-orient toward publicity in a way that accounts for settler colonialism and decolonization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.673115/fullpublics and counterpublicsrhetoricenvironmental decision makingNative American and Indigenous Studiespublic landbears ears national monument
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taylor N. Johnson
spellingShingle Taylor N. Johnson
Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument
Frontiers in Communication
publics and counterpublics
rhetoric
environmental decision making
Native American and Indigenous Studies
public land
bears ears national monument
author_facet Taylor N. Johnson
author_sort Taylor N. Johnson
title Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument
title_short Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument
title_full Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument
title_fullStr Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument
title_sort indigenous publicity in american public lands controversies: environmental participation in the fight for bears ears national monument
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Communication
issn 2297-900X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Environmental decision-making scholars have attended closely to the role of publics and counterpublics in environmental controversies. However, this body of work has undertheorized the ways that Indigeneity may complicate access to or desirability of American publicity as a driving force in environmental advocacy. Inclusion within the American national body both functions as an advocacy tool for Native people and as a colonial discourse that may undermine sovereignty goals. Through a critical rhetorical analysis of documents at the center of the controversy over Bears Ears National Monument, this essay explicates the deployment of American publicity both to support and to undermine Native advocacy for the Monument. Scholars of rhetoric and environmental decision-making must re-orient toward publicity in a way that accounts for settler colonialism and decolonization.
topic publics and counterpublics
rhetoric
environmental decision making
Native American and Indigenous Studies
public land
bears ears national monument
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.673115/full
work_keys_str_mv AT taylornjohnson indigenouspublicityinamericanpubliclandscontroversiesenvironmentalparticipationinthefightforbearsearsnationalmonument
_version_ 1721278699278434304