Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
|
Series: | Revista Dor |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-a0883868cfdf4904a51c21177d9ea87b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0883868cfdf4904a51c21177d9ea87b2020-11-25T03:07:57ZengSociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da DorRevista Dor1806-00132317-63931812710.5935/1806-0013.20170002S1806-00132017000100002Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trialFernando Augusto Gonçalves TavaresThais Cristina ChavesEdnéia Denise SilvaGabriela Dionísio GuerreiroJoysse Ferreira GonçalvesAdriana Aparecida Alves de AlbuquerqueABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of back joint mobilization on the following outcomes: pain intensity and incapacity in chronic low back pain patients. METHODS: Participated in the study 60 individuals of both genders with the following eligibility criteria: aged between 18 and 55 years with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least three months. Selected volunteers were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 individuals: joint mobilization group MG: 39.15±11.45 years, sham mobilization group SG: 37.10±12.57 years, and control group CG: 30.60±8.97. All groups were evaluated by the same blind investigator and have answered to the following tools pre-and immediately after the ten intervention sessions: pain numeric scale to evaluate pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index to evaluate low back pain-related incapacity and Catastrophic Thoughts Scale to evaluate pain-related catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant pre-and post-treatment differences in pain intensity for MG (p<0.001) and SG (p<0.001). There has been significant difference in mean pain intensity value in MG as compared to CG (-2.55). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest sham effect related to the application of mobilization in chronic low back pain patients.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002&lng=en&tlng=encatastrofização da dordor lombarensaio clínicomobilização articularterapia manual |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fernando Augusto Gonçalves Tavares Thais Cristina Chaves Ednéia Denise Silva Gabriela Dionísio Guerreiro Joysse Ferreira Gonçalves Adriana Aparecida Alves de Albuquerque |
spellingShingle |
Fernando Augusto Gonçalves Tavares Thais Cristina Chaves Ednéia Denise Silva Gabriela Dionísio Guerreiro Joysse Ferreira Gonçalves Adriana Aparecida Alves de Albuquerque Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial Revista Dor catastrofização da dor dor lombar ensaio clínico mobilização articular terapia manual |
author_facet |
Fernando Augusto Gonçalves Tavares Thais Cristina Chaves Ednéia Denise Silva Gabriela Dionísio Guerreiro Joysse Ferreira Gonçalves Adriana Aparecida Alves de Albuquerque |
author_sort |
Fernando Augusto Gonçalves Tavares |
title |
Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_short |
Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full |
Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial |
title_sort |
immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor |
series |
Revista Dor |
issn |
1806-0013 2317-6393 |
description |
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of back joint mobilization on the following outcomes: pain intensity and incapacity in chronic low back pain patients. METHODS: Participated in the study 60 individuals of both genders with the following eligibility criteria: aged between 18 and 55 years with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least three months. Selected volunteers were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 individuals: joint mobilization group MG: 39.15±11.45 years, sham mobilization group SG: 37.10±12.57 years, and control group CG: 30.60±8.97. All groups were evaluated by the same blind investigator and have answered to the following tools pre-and immediately after the ten intervention sessions: pain numeric scale to evaluate pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index to evaluate low back pain-related incapacity and Catastrophic Thoughts Scale to evaluate pain-related catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant pre-and post-treatment differences in pain intensity for MG (p<0.001) and SG (p<0.001). There has been significant difference in mean pain intensity value in MG as compared to CG (-2.55). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest sham effect related to the application of mobilization in chronic low back pain patients. |
topic |
catastrofização da dor dor lombar ensaio clínico mobilização articular terapia manual |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fernandoaugustogoncalvestavares immediateeffectsofjointmobilizationcomparedtoshamandcontrolinterventionforpainintensityanddisabilityinchroniclowbackpainpatientsrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT thaiscristinachaves immediateeffectsofjointmobilizationcomparedtoshamandcontrolinterventionforpainintensityanddisabilityinchroniclowbackpainpatientsrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT edneiadenisesilva immediateeffectsofjointmobilizationcomparedtoshamandcontrolinterventionforpainintensityanddisabilityinchroniclowbackpainpatientsrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT gabrieladionisioguerreiro immediateeffectsofjointmobilizationcomparedtoshamandcontrolinterventionforpainintensityanddisabilityinchroniclowbackpainpatientsrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT joysseferreiragoncalves immediateeffectsofjointmobilizationcomparedtoshamandcontrolinterventionforpainintensityanddisabilityinchroniclowbackpainpatientsrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT adrianaaparecidaalvesdealbuquerque immediateeffectsofjointmobilizationcomparedtoshamandcontrolinterventionforpainintensityanddisabilityinchroniclowbackpainpatientsrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |
_version_ |
1724668167885684736 |