Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life

Health, well-being, quality of life, and lifestyle are central concepts within health science, although generally accepted definitions are still lacking. Lifestyle can either be seen as an independent variable and the cause of unhealthy behaviour or as a dependent variable, which is affected by cond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ove Svensson, Lillemor R-M Hallberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2011-05-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijqhw.net/index.php/qhw/article/view/7137/8484
id doaj-a0b9647945084d0991ae912636e9bc42
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0b9647945084d0991ae912636e9bc422020-11-24T23:23:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being1748-26231748-26312011-05-01621510.3402/qhw.v6i2.7137Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of lifeOve SvenssonLillemor R-M HallbergHealth, well-being, quality of life, and lifestyle are central concepts within health science, although generally accepted definitions are still lacking. Lifestyle can either be seen as an independent variable and the cause of unhealthy behaviour or as a dependent variable, which is affected by conditions in the society. In the first case, the attention is directed on each individual case: maintaining or improving health requires changes in lifestyle and living habits. In this perspective, diet and physical activity are important features for health promotion. In the second case the attention is rather directed on structural conditions in society, for example the food industry, the lunches for children at school, and the “fast food” industry should be influenced to protect human health. The structural perspective has, so far, received restricted impact when it concerns prevention and promotion of health. Processes of individualisation in the society have to an increasing extent viewed health as an affair for the individual. The benefits of physical activity, healthy food and beverage, social support, and joy are documented scientifically. In general, the trend towards increasing responsibility for one's lifestyle and health is positive, but might reinforce the inequality in health. With an even harder climate in society there might be a risk that individual health projects undermine the solidarity and the will to accept costs for medical treatment and care for people who risk their health through an unhealthy and risk-taking lifestyle. However, we argue that peoples’ well-being and quality of life presupposes a society that stands up for all people.http://www.ijqhw.net/index.php/qhw/article/view/7137/8484Healthwell-beinglifestylequality of life
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ove Svensson
Lillemor R-M Hallberg
spellingShingle Ove Svensson
Lillemor R-M Hallberg
Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
Health
well-being
lifestyle
quality of life
author_facet Ove Svensson
Lillemor R-M Hallberg
author_sort Ove Svensson
title Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
title_short Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
title_full Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
title_fullStr Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
title_full_unstemmed Hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
title_sort hunting for health, well-being, and quality of life
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
issn 1748-2623
1748-2631
publishDate 2011-05-01
description Health, well-being, quality of life, and lifestyle are central concepts within health science, although generally accepted definitions are still lacking. Lifestyle can either be seen as an independent variable and the cause of unhealthy behaviour or as a dependent variable, which is affected by conditions in the society. In the first case, the attention is directed on each individual case: maintaining or improving health requires changes in lifestyle and living habits. In this perspective, diet and physical activity are important features for health promotion. In the second case the attention is rather directed on structural conditions in society, for example the food industry, the lunches for children at school, and the “fast food” industry should be influenced to protect human health. The structural perspective has, so far, received restricted impact when it concerns prevention and promotion of health. Processes of individualisation in the society have to an increasing extent viewed health as an affair for the individual. The benefits of physical activity, healthy food and beverage, social support, and joy are documented scientifically. In general, the trend towards increasing responsibility for one's lifestyle and health is positive, but might reinforce the inequality in health. With an even harder climate in society there might be a risk that individual health projects undermine the solidarity and the will to accept costs for medical treatment and care for people who risk their health through an unhealthy and risk-taking lifestyle. However, we argue that peoples’ well-being and quality of life presupposes a society that stands up for all people.
topic Health
well-being
lifestyle
quality of life
url http://www.ijqhw.net/index.php/qhw/article/view/7137/8484
work_keys_str_mv AT ovesvensson huntingforhealthwellbeingandqualityoflife
AT lillemorrmhallberg huntingforhealthwellbeingandqualityoflife
_version_ 1725563769983074304