Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
Previous reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998–2003), while finding that trend...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2021-09-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/71712 |
id |
doaj-a12ea2a41d9b414dab008e15a49041e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a12ea2a41d9b414dab008e15a49041e62021-09-17T14:46:16ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2021-09-011010.7554/eLife.71712Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant fundingMichael S Lauer0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-8177Deepshikha Roychowdhury1National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, Bethesda, United StatesNIH Office of Extramural Research, Bethesda, United StatesPrevious reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998–2003), while finding that trends in recent years have reversed for both investigators and institutions, but only to a modest degree. We also find that career-stage trends have stabilized, with equivalent proportions of early-, mid-, and late-career investigators funded from 2017 to 2020. The fraction of women among funded PIs continues to increase, but they are still not at parity. Analyses of funding inequalities show that inequalities for investigators, and to a lesser degree for institutions, have consistently been greater within groups (i.e. within groups by career stage, gender, race, and degree) than between groups.https://elifesciences.org/articles/71712research fundingpolicyworkforceinequalitygovernment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael S Lauer Deepshikha Roychowdhury |
spellingShingle |
Michael S Lauer Deepshikha Roychowdhury Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding eLife research funding policy workforce inequality government |
author_facet |
Michael S Lauer Deepshikha Roychowdhury |
author_sort |
Michael S Lauer |
title |
Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding |
title_short |
Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding |
title_full |
Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding |
title_fullStr |
Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding |
title_sort |
inequalities in the distribution of national institutes of health research project grant funding |
publisher |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd |
series |
eLife |
issn |
2050-084X |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Previous reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998–2003), while finding that trends in recent years have reversed for both investigators and institutions, but only to a modest degree. We also find that career-stage trends have stabilized, with equivalent proportions of early-, mid-, and late-career investigators funded from 2017 to 2020. The fraction of women among funded PIs continues to increase, but they are still not at parity. Analyses of funding inequalities show that inequalities for investigators, and to a lesser degree for institutions, have consistently been greater within groups (i.e. within groups by career stage, gender, race, and degree) than between groups. |
topic |
research funding policy workforce inequality government |
url |
https://elifesciences.org/articles/71712 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelslauer inequalitiesinthedistributionofnationalinstitutesofhealthresearchprojectgrantfunding AT deepshikharoychowdhury inequalitiesinthedistributionofnationalinstitutesofhealthresearchprojectgrantfunding |
_version_ |
1717377170750308352 |