Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding

Previous reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998–2003), while finding that trend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael S Lauer, Deepshikha Roychowdhury
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2021-09-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/71712
id doaj-a12ea2a41d9b414dab008e15a49041e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a12ea2a41d9b414dab008e15a49041e62021-09-17T14:46:16ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2021-09-011010.7554/eLife.71712Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant fundingMichael S Lauer0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-8177Deepshikha Roychowdhury1National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, Bethesda, United StatesNIH Office of Extramural Research, Bethesda, United StatesPrevious reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998–2003), while finding that trends in recent years have reversed for both investigators and institutions, but only to a modest degree. We also find that career-stage trends have stabilized, with equivalent proportions of early-, mid-, and late-career investigators funded from 2017 to 2020. The fraction of women among funded PIs continues to increase, but they are still not at parity. Analyses of funding inequalities show that inequalities for investigators, and to a lesser degree for institutions, have consistently been greater within groups (i.e. within groups by career stage, gender, race, and degree) than between groups.https://elifesciences.org/articles/71712research fundingpolicyworkforceinequalitygovernment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael S Lauer
Deepshikha Roychowdhury
spellingShingle Michael S Lauer
Deepshikha Roychowdhury
Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
eLife
research funding
policy
workforce
inequality
government
author_facet Michael S Lauer
Deepshikha Roychowdhury
author_sort Michael S Lauer
title Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
title_short Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
title_full Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
title_fullStr Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
title_full_unstemmed Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding
title_sort inequalities in the distribution of national institutes of health research project grant funding
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Previous reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998–2003), while finding that trends in recent years have reversed for both investigators and institutions, but only to a modest degree. We also find that career-stage trends have stabilized, with equivalent proportions of early-, mid-, and late-career investigators funded from 2017 to 2020. The fraction of women among funded PIs continues to increase, but they are still not at parity. Analyses of funding inequalities show that inequalities for investigators, and to a lesser degree for institutions, have consistently been greater within groups (i.e. within groups by career stage, gender, race, and degree) than between groups.
topic research funding
policy
workforce
inequality
government
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/71712
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelslauer inequalitiesinthedistributionofnationalinstitutesofhealthresearchprojectgrantfunding
AT deepshikharoychowdhury inequalitiesinthedistributionofnationalinstitutesofhealthresearchprojectgrantfunding
_version_ 1717377170750308352