Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>For eukaryotes, there is almost no strand bias with regard to base composition, with exceptions for origins of replication and transcription start sites and transcribed regions. This paper revisits the question for subsequences of DN...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evans Kenneth J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-01-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/43
id doaj-a13d19d3240d4f43858a5d7d400ed204
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a13d19d3240d4f43858a5d7d400ed2042020-11-25T00:05:39ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642008-01-01914310.1186/1471-2164-9-43Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequencesEvans Kenneth J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>For eukaryotes, there is almost no strand bias with regard to base composition, with exceptions for origins of replication and transcription start sites and transcribed regions. This paper revisits the question for subsequences of DNA taken at random from the genome.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For a typical mammal, for example mouse or human, there is a small strand bias throughout the genomic DNA: there is a correlation between (<it>G </it>- <it>C</it>) and (<it>A </it>- <it>T</it>) on the same strand, (that is between the difference in the number of guanine and cytosine bases and the difference in the number of adenine and thymine bases). For small subsequences – up to 1 kb – this correlation is weak but positive; but for large windows – around 50 kb to 2 Mb – the correlation is strong and negative. This effect is largely independent of GC%. Transcribed and untranscribed regions give similar correlations both for small and large subsequences, but there is a difference in these regions for intermediate sized subsequences. An analysis of the human genome showed that position within the isochore structure did not affect these correlations. An analysis of available genomes of different species shows that this contrast between large and small windows is a general feature of mammals and birds. Further down the evolutionary tree, other organisms show a similar but smaller effect. Except for the nematode, all the animals analysed showed at least a small effect.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The correlations on the large scale may be explained by DNA replication. Transcription may be a modifier of these effects but is not the fundamental cause. These results cast light on how DNA mutations affect the genome over evolutionary time. At least for vertebrates, there is a broad relationship between body temperature and the size of the correlation. The genome of mammals and birds has a structure marked by strand bias segments.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/43
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evans Kenneth J
spellingShingle Evans Kenneth J
Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
BMC Genomics
author_facet Evans Kenneth J
author_sort Evans Kenneth J
title Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
title_short Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
title_full Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
title_fullStr Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
title_full_unstemmed Genomic DNA from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
title_sort genomic dna from animals shows contrasting strand bias in large and small subsequences
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2008-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>For eukaryotes, there is almost no strand bias with regard to base composition, with exceptions for origins of replication and transcription start sites and transcribed regions. This paper revisits the question for subsequences of DNA taken at random from the genome.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For a typical mammal, for example mouse or human, there is a small strand bias throughout the genomic DNA: there is a correlation between (<it>G </it>- <it>C</it>) and (<it>A </it>- <it>T</it>) on the same strand, (that is between the difference in the number of guanine and cytosine bases and the difference in the number of adenine and thymine bases). For small subsequences – up to 1 kb – this correlation is weak but positive; but for large windows – around 50 kb to 2 Mb – the correlation is strong and negative. This effect is largely independent of GC%. Transcribed and untranscribed regions give similar correlations both for small and large subsequences, but there is a difference in these regions for intermediate sized subsequences. An analysis of the human genome showed that position within the isochore structure did not affect these correlations. An analysis of available genomes of different species shows that this contrast between large and small windows is a general feature of mammals and birds. Further down the evolutionary tree, other organisms show a similar but smaller effect. Except for the nematode, all the animals analysed showed at least a small effect.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The correlations on the large scale may be explained by DNA replication. Transcription may be a modifier of these effects but is not the fundamental cause. These results cast light on how DNA mutations affect the genome over evolutionary time. At least for vertebrates, there is a broad relationship between body temperature and the size of the correlation. The genome of mammals and birds has a structure marked by strand bias segments.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/43
work_keys_str_mv AT evanskennethj genomicdnafromanimalsshowscontrastingstrandbiasinlargeandsmallsubsequences
_version_ 1725424075276288000