Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world

Medical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication, variable degrees of manuscript checking and increasing accessibility pose some challenges to compliance with ethical guidelines f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Hays, Ken Masters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) 2020-03-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2840
id doaj-a14e8118d3644902a3442618587d63a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a14e8118d3644902a3442618587d63a32020-11-25T02:31:44ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962020-03-0191Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing worldRichard Hays0Ken Masters1James Cook UniversityMedical Education & Informatics Department, College of Medicine & Health Sciences Sultan Qaboos UniversityMedical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication, variable degrees of manuscript checking and increasing accessibility pose some challenges to compliance with ethical guidelines for academic publication. In this paper we review the literature and the websites of journals that publish medical education content and present a contemporary view on issues that should be considered by authors, reviewers, editors and readers of medical education publications. Based on this analysis, we present guidance on how to meet desired ethical standards when writing particular categories of manuscripts. Relying on self-judgement of the ethical status by authors may no longer be acceptable. The need to meet ethical guidelines in publishing must be balanced with the desire for freedom of speech and avoidance of editorial bias. Our intention is to provoke discussion and learning within the medical education community of practice. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2840Medical educationpublishing ethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Hays
Ken Masters
spellingShingle Richard Hays
Ken Masters
Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
MedEdPublish
Medical education
publishing ethics
author_facet Richard Hays
Ken Masters
author_sort Richard Hays
title Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
title_short Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
title_full Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
title_fullStr Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
title_full_unstemmed Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
title_sort publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
publisher Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
series MedEdPublish
issn 2312-7996
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Medical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication, variable degrees of manuscript checking and increasing accessibility pose some challenges to compliance with ethical guidelines for academic publication. In this paper we review the literature and the websites of journals that publish medical education content and present a contemporary view on issues that should be considered by authors, reviewers, editors and readers of medical education publications. Based on this analysis, we present guidance on how to meet desired ethical standards when writing particular categories of manuscripts. Relying on self-judgement of the ethical status by authors may no longer be acceptable. The need to meet ethical guidelines in publishing must be balanced with the desire for freedom of speech and avoidance of editorial bias. Our intention is to provoke discussion and learning within the medical education community of practice.
topic Medical education
publishing ethics
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2840
work_keys_str_mv AT richardhays publishingethicsinmedicaleducationguidanceforauthorsandreviewersinachangingworld
AT kenmasters publishingethicsinmedicaleducationguidanceforauthorsandreviewersinachangingworld
_version_ 1724822408140947456