Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world
Medical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication, variable degrees of manuscript checking and increasing accessibility pose some challenges to compliance with ethical guidelines f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
2020-03-01
|
Series: | MedEdPublish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2840 |
id |
doaj-a14e8118d3644902a3442618587d63a3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a14e8118d3644902a3442618587d63a32020-11-25T02:31:44ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962020-03-0191Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing worldRichard Hays0Ken Masters1James Cook UniversityMedical Education & Informatics Department, College of Medicine & Health Sciences Sultan Qaboos UniversityMedical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication, variable degrees of manuscript checking and increasing accessibility pose some challenges to compliance with ethical guidelines for academic publication. In this paper we review the literature and the websites of journals that publish medical education content and present a contemporary view on issues that should be considered by authors, reviewers, editors and readers of medical education publications. Based on this analysis, we present guidance on how to meet desired ethical standards when writing particular categories of manuscripts. Relying on self-judgement of the ethical status by authors may no longer be acceptable. The need to meet ethical guidelines in publishing must be balanced with the desire for freedom of speech and avoidance of editorial bias. Our intention is to provoke discussion and learning within the medical education community of practice. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2840Medical educationpublishing ethics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Richard Hays Ken Masters |
spellingShingle |
Richard Hays Ken Masters Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world MedEdPublish Medical education publishing ethics |
author_facet |
Richard Hays Ken Masters |
author_sort |
Richard Hays |
title |
Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world |
title_short |
Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world |
title_full |
Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world |
title_fullStr |
Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world |
title_full_unstemmed |
Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world |
title_sort |
publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world |
publisher |
Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) |
series |
MedEdPublish |
issn |
2312-7996 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Medical education publishing is growing rapidly, with both increasing demand for publication space and increasing space availability. The increasing speed of publication, variable degrees of manuscript checking and increasing accessibility pose some challenges to compliance with ethical guidelines for academic publication. In this paper we review the literature and the websites of journals that publish medical education content and present a contemporary view on issues that should be considered by authors, reviewers, editors and readers of medical education publications. Based on this analysis, we present guidance on how to meet desired ethical standards when writing particular categories of manuscripts. Relying on self-judgement of the ethical status by authors may no longer be acceptable. The need to meet ethical guidelines in publishing must be balanced with the desire for freedom of speech and avoidance of editorial bias. Our intention is to provoke discussion and learning within the medical education community of practice.
|
topic |
Medical education publishing ethics |
url |
https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2840 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT richardhays publishingethicsinmedicaleducationguidanceforauthorsandreviewersinachangingworld AT kenmasters publishingethicsinmedicaleducationguidanceforauthorsandreviewersinachangingworld |
_version_ |
1724822408140947456 |