Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting

Metal detecting and archaeology do not always coexist peacefully. Indeed, even in the current climate of participation and inclusion within public and community archaeologies, there are still issues of trust to address, relating to both metal-detector users and archaeologists. While in the UK there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suzie Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2013-03-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
PAS
Online Access:http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue33/editorial.cfm
id doaj-a15b112e881c4b81a1a08fd64b51d677
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a15b112e881c4b81a1a08fd64b51d6772020-11-25T01:57:07ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872013-03-013310.11141/ia.33.12 Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detectingSuzie Thomas0University of GlasgowMetal detecting and archaeology do not always coexist peacefully. Indeed, even in the current climate of participation and inclusion within public and community archaeologies, there are still issues of trust to address, relating to both metal-detector users and archaeologists. While in the UK there have been disagreements between archaeologists and metal-detector users over the years, there have also been some significant steps made in encouraging metal-detector users to cooperate with the archaeological sector. Perhaps the most successful and best known of these is the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS), active across England and Wales. Add to this mix those that provide the commercial demand for metal-detected finds, the dealers and private collectors, and a clash of interests and motivations seems inevitable. Most would hope that relationships, positive in many cases but also problematic, will improve, both in the interests of enhancing the recording of non-stratified finds, and of promoting a publicly accessible and inclusive archaeology. However, is this an inevitable progression, or ultimately unachievable?http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue33/editorial.cfmeditorialmetal detectingarchaeologyPASdisagreement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suzie Thomas
spellingShingle Suzie Thomas
Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
Internet Archaeology
editorial
metal detecting
archaeology
PAS
disagreement
author_facet Suzie Thomas
author_sort Suzie Thomas
title Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
title_short Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
title_full Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
title_fullStr Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
title_full_unstemmed Editorial: Portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
title_sort editorial: portable antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting
publisher University of York
series Internet Archaeology
issn 1363-5387
publishDate 2013-03-01
description Metal detecting and archaeology do not always coexist peacefully. Indeed, even in the current climate of participation and inclusion within public and community archaeologies, there are still issues of trust to address, relating to both metal-detector users and archaeologists. While in the UK there have been disagreements between archaeologists and metal-detector users over the years, there have also been some significant steps made in encouraging metal-detector users to cooperate with the archaeological sector. Perhaps the most successful and best known of these is the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS), active across England and Wales. Add to this mix those that provide the commercial demand for metal-detected finds, the dealers and private collectors, and a clash of interests and motivations seems inevitable. Most would hope that relationships, positive in many cases but also problematic, will improve, both in the interests of enhancing the recording of non-stratified finds, and of promoting a publicly accessible and inclusive archaeology. However, is this an inevitable progression, or ultimately unachievable?
topic editorial
metal detecting
archaeology
PAS
disagreement
url http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue33/editorial.cfm
work_keys_str_mv AT suziethomas editorialportableantiquitiesarchaeologycollectingmetaldetecting
_version_ 1724976147808124928