Accuracy Assessment on MODIS (V006), GLASS and MuSyQ Land-Surface Albedo Products: A Case Study in the Heihe River Basin, China

• Main Authors: Xiaodan Wu, Jianguang Wen, Qing Xiao, Dongqin You, Baocheng Dou, Xinwen Lin, Andreas Hueni
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
• Series: Remote Sensing
• Subjects: assessment; albedo; scale mismatch; surface heterogeneity; representativeness error
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/12/2045

This study assessed accuracies of MCD43A3, Global Land-Surface Satellite (GLASS) and forthcoming Multi-source Data Synergized Quantitative Remote Sensing Production system (MuSyQ) albedos using ground observations and Huan Jing (HJ) data over the Heihe River Basin. MCD43A3 and MuSyQ albedos show similar high accuracies with identical root mean square errors (RMSE). Nevertheless, MuSyQ albedo is better correlated with ground measurements when sufficient valid observations are available or snow-free. The opposite happens when less than seven valid observations are available. GLASS albedo presents a larger RMSE than MCD43A3 and MuSyQ albedos in comparison with ground measurements. Over surfaces with smaller seasonal variations, MCD43A3 and MuSyQ albedos show smaller RMSEs than GLASS albedo in comparison with HJ albedo. However, for surfaces with larger temporal variations, both RMSEs and R² of GLASS albedo are comparable with MCD43A3 and MuSyQ. Generally, MCD43A3 and MuSyQ albedos featured the same RMSEs of 0.034 and similar R² (0.920 and 0.903, respectively), which are better than GLASS albedo (RMSE = 0.043, R² = 0.787). However, when it comes to comparison with aggregated HJ albedo, MuSyQ and GLASS albedos are with lower RMSEs of 0.027 and 0.032 and higher R² of 0.900 and 0.898 respectively than MCD43A3 (RMSE = 0.038, R² = 0.836). Despite the limited geographic region of the study area, they still provide an important insight into the accuracies of three albedo products.